
"The Cold War's First Conflict" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article We're back to stump you again with three more figures!
Featured Workbench Article Hundvig is not a real big fan of pre-painted minis, and he positively despises randomly-packed "collectable" ones - so why is he writing this article?
Featured Profile Article sargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Editor in Chief Bill  | 25 Jun 2019 5:12 p.m. PST |
With virtually no combatants to battle at sea, the U.S. Navy found itself waging a different sort of war when the Korean conflict broke out 60 years ago—one that put a premium on seaborne mobility, air power, and shore bombardments. link |
|