Mark did anymore M4A1 76mm make it to NWE before September or was it just the initial 100?
This is my understanding.
Hard to prove a negative, so I offer the view with full willingness to be shown if I am wrong. But I believe that the first 100 were all that came into ETO until the taps started flowing on the M4A3s with the 76mm gun.
Pulling from memory, but I think there were about 30 medium tank battalions in Armored Divisions in ETO by the end of summer. Most of the 76mm armed Shermans went to these. That means perhaps 3 per battalion, or 1 per company, if they had been really evenly distributed. No reason to assume they were that evenly spread around, though, so you should think in terms of 0 to 6 per battalion. That could be 0 to 2 per company, again if the battalions did even distribution. We have no reason to assume all battalions did this, though, so you might see 0 to 6 in a given company, or even 0 to 5 in a given platoon.
But keep in mind that this is total available over a period of 3 months or so, not total available on any given day.
After the tap opened on 76mm Sherman shipments it was still few-to-none of the M4A1s with the 76mm gun coming into ETO. The flow of 76mm armed Shermans into ETO was all (almost all?) M4A3s. Then the flow started to shift to M4A3 76mm HVSS ("M4A3E8") in winter -- maybe around December.
New armored divisions that arrived / deployed in ETO in the fall probably had a reasonable quantity from the start -- maybe 6 to 9 per battalion (could be distributed down to 1 per platoon). Armored divisions that had already been in ETO for months would have had a relatively eclectic mix of Shermans by late fall -- perhaps mostly M4A1 75mm Shermans, with a couple M4 105mm HMC Shermans, one or two M4A1 76mm Shermans, and perhaps another couple M4A3 76mm Shermans.
In this same timeframe the GHQ tank battalions (infantry support tank battalions) would have been last in line for the 76mm Shermans, but first in line for the Sherman (M4A3E2) Jumbos. Quantities there got up past 4 or 5 per battalion pretty quickly in the fall.
Both Armored Division and GHQ tank battalions were clamoring at the time for their share of the 105mm Shermans. Which version they got (M4 or M4A3) depended mostly on what the dominant version of Sherman was in their battalion. If they had M4s or M4A1s (radial engines) they got M4 105s. If they had M4A3s (Ford GAA engines) they got M4A3 105s. Mostly. Theoretically. But not always.
At least that was the intent -- providing 105mm Shermans with an engine type matched to the engine type of the other Shermans in the battalion.
But with the 76mm Shermans it was more just that the M4A1s were all that was available in summer, and went to ETO. By fall the M4A3s went to ETO, and the M4A1s went to MTO, and that's what you got regardless of the dominant Sherman type in the battalion. Oh, and M4A2s with the 76mm went to other armies. Again pretty much regardless of what their dominant Sherman type was.
As I think of building my wargaming US Army, in the summer of 1944 I use M4A1s for my 76mm Shermans, but they should be rare. Fall and the 76mm Shermans start to become more common (growing numbers into winter), but they will mostly be M4A3s with VVS suspensions. Then in winter M4A3s with HVSS start appearing, again rare, while the majority of Shermans with 76mm are still M4A3s with VVS. By end of war in ETO (April/May 1945) Sherman 76s are starting to become the majority in some, but maybe not all, formations (perhaps 2 or 3 per platoon). M4A3 HVSS are no longer rare, but still there are probably more M4A3 VVS around. M4A1s with 76mm in ETO should still be rare, perhaps rare enough to ignore entirely. But in MTO those very lovely M4A1 76mm HVSS Shermans (don't know why, but that's my favorite look for a Sherman) should be reasonably common.
Y'all got that? Hope you were taking notes, it'll be on the test at the end of the semester.
-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)