Help support TMP

"Peter Pig vs Battlefront M113 - comparison / Follow up" Topic

4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Modern Product Reviews Message Board

Areas of Interest


Featured Hobby News Article

Featured Ruleset

Featured Showcase Article

1:300 Ram V-1 Scout Car

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian equips his Israeli recon unit.

Featured Profile Article

Those Blasted Trees

How do you depict "shattered forest" on the tabletop?

Featured Movie Review

556 hits since 30 May 2019
©1994-2020 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

repaint30 May 2019 8:12 p.m. PST

To make it short, I like both. They both have their own advantages.



PraetorianHistorian31 May 2019 5:20 a.m. PST

Thanks. Glad I 3D printed my M113s instead of bought them. Battlefront continues to disappoint me.

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP31 May 2019 9:26 a.m. PST

QRF makes a nice M113A2, although it's in metal.

Andoreth31 May 2019 4:57 p.m. PST

M113s are virtually all the same, the vehicle is well documented and models from Battlefront. Old Glory, QRF and Peter Pig are all compatible. What I like about Peter Pig's vehicles are that they come with stowage/clutter. If you are not good at getting realistic stowage I would go with them. If you want clean vehicles I would go with Battlefront which, being plastic, are lighter and come with more options than metal models for skirts and weapons.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.