"Peter Pig vs Battlefront M113 - comparison / Follow up" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article "Hefty" metal die-cast cars are cheap this time of year.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| repaint | 30 May 2019 7:12 p.m. PST |
To make it short, I like both. They both have their own advantages.
link |
| PraetorianHistorian | 31 May 2019 4:20 a.m. PST |
Thanks. Glad I 3D printed my M113s instead of bought them. Battlefront continues to disappoint me. |
 javelin98  | 31 May 2019 8:26 a.m. PST |
QRF makes a nice M113A2, although it's in metal. |
| Andoreth | 31 May 2019 3:57 p.m. PST |
M113s are virtually all the same, the vehicle is well documented and models from Battlefront. Old Glory, QRF and Peter Pig are all compatible. What I like about Peter Pig's vehicles are that they come with stowage/clutter. If you are not good at getting realistic stowage I would go with them. If you want clean vehicles I would go with Battlefront which, being plastic, are lighter and come with more options than metal models for skirts and weapons. |
|
gets his hands on some fields and fences.
