Editor in Chief Bill | 13 May 2019 6:14 p.m. PST |
Which land-warfare rulesets covering the post-WWII historical period have made the most impact on game design? |
miniMo | 13 May 2019 7:30 p.m. PST |
|
lkmjbc3 | 13 May 2019 7:40 p.m. PST |
Challenger 1/2000… The ultimate in detail. WRG… Showing that you didn't need all the detail. Combined Arms…Battalion/Regimental game with platoons as elements. FFT x… A refinement of Combined Arms using more modern mechanism. Modern Spearhead… A brigade/ division game with a focus on a higher level of command. Honorable mention.. Cold War Commander for it's emphasis on Command factors. Joe Collins |
aegiscg47 | 13 May 2019 7:42 p.m. PST |
Combined Arms (Command Decision for the modern period)-Issuing orders for units with chits. Tacforce-A novel idea (using the data cards) that proved difficult to support and thus became an example of what not to do with a set of rules! Challenger and Challenger 2000-Took basically the WRG format and turned it into something playable/enjoyable. Cold War Commander-Took a command and control system from a fantasy war-game and successfully applied it to a modern combat game. |
David Manley | 13 May 2019 7:42 p.m. PST |
|
David Manley | 13 May 2019 7:46 p.m. PST |
Challenger was something playable? Our group tried it after using WRG, found it did the same thing but was painfully slooow and went back to WRG for a much more enjoyable experience. btw that's the edition with the T62 and the smoke on the cover, not the awful second edition that introduced Challenger-esqe levels of tedium and slow olay |
dragon6 | 13 May 2019 8:50 p.m. PST |
I agree with Mr Manley about wrg and 1st vs 2nd but Harpoon? Painfully slow doesn't begin to describe Harpoon 4 or 4.1. Although the parameters of discussion limited it to land warfare if we allow naval then Warship Commander 2/Sea Command was actually playable vs H4.X |
emckinney | 13 May 2019 11:05 p.m. PST |
And Warship Commmander 2/Sea Command explicitly modeled electronic warfare. However, the rules did little to influence later designs, so I don't consider them significant. |
emckinney | 13 May 2019 11:15 p.m. PST |
Flames of War. Retook tablespace from WH40K, gave people a WWII game where they could actually find opponents*, got more people buying WWII figs, which allowed PSC to launch "game detail" injection molded models, which brought prices down for common tanks, and generally brought new (young) blood into the hobby. And they're successfully expanding into moderns (1980s, Arab-Israeli wars). *Many people played WH40K because they knew they could always find opponents, not because they loved the setting or the rules. Without "one game to rule them all," you were certain to find that your carefully collected WWII armies were in the wrong scale when you moved to a new area. And you'd have to learn a whole new rules set, anyhow. Ironically, this was a particular problem for those in the military … |
DestoFante | 14 May 2019 1:49 a.m. PST |
I am surprised nobody has mentioned Ambush Alley/Force on Force yet. I'd think it is one of the most significant modern rulesets, and highly representative of the trends in the hobby over the last 10-15 years. |
repaint | 14 May 2019 4:20 a.m. PST |
Cold War Commander Force on Force Team Yankee No end in sight Fireteam modern |
martin goddard | 14 May 2019 4:31 a.m. PST |
|
Mkultra99 | 14 May 2019 4:46 a.m. PST |
Haha "Harpoon"? That's either very funny… or sad.. I can't tell which over the internets. Stargrunt 2 of course.. it's influence is still being felt in game design. |
martinjpayne1964 | 14 May 2019 4:49 a.m. PST |
|
dwight shrute | 14 May 2019 5:04 a.m. PST |
force on force took many of its ideas from stargrunt . |
charles popp | 14 May 2019 6:22 a.m. PST |
Gene McCoys Standard rules from the Wargame Digest. It is the grandfather for all modern rules that use platoon as the base unit. |
miniMo | 14 May 2019 6:53 a.m. PST |
McCoy alas never published rules, just the Standard Units. |
14th NJ Vol | 14 May 2019 7:29 a.m. PST |
Fist Full of TOWS. A trend toward playability over the minutia of Rivet counting that make modern games painfully slow to play. A shout out for GHQ Modern MicroArmor rules to. |
Patrick Sexton | 14 May 2019 7:35 a.m. PST |
Force on Force. Flames of War. |
French Wargame Holidays | 14 May 2019 8:19 a.m. PST |
Cold War Commander Force on Force AK47 Fireteam modern |
22ndFoot | 14 May 2019 11:11 a.m. PST |
The TooFatLardies sets – first I Ain't Been Shot, Mum and then Chain of Command both represent significant evolutions for me. Got me back into twentieth century gaming after a very long hiatus anyway. |
TankerTom | 14 May 2019 11:12 a.m. PST |
If by significant you mean widely played and influential than I agree with Joe Collins. Challenger I/II/2000 …widely played but very detailed. WRG …Great set. Widely played and very playable. I played this a lot. Combined Arms …Made one model equal one unit not just one tank. Very influential set. Loved playing it. FFT … Widely played. Been around for a long time. Modern Spearhead …A superb set (along with WW2 version). Widely played and very playable. Each stand is a platoon but you command brigades and divisions. Tac Force card concept was interesting. Played a few times in the army but didn't find it compelling/fun. Team Yankee has the potential to be an influential set. FOW isn't my cup of tea but it is a set that If I have an army, I can show up at a convention and be pretty confident I can find an opponent using the same scale and rules…a very attractive option. |
Lion in the Stars | 14 May 2019 2:01 p.m. PST |
Ambush Alley/Force on Force. Stargrunt (and maybe Dirtside). Flames of War is influential because it took table space from the 40k crowd. You are almost guaranteed to be able to find a FoW game when you move to a new place. |
Generalstoner49 | 14 May 2019 3:27 p.m. PST |
Force on Force/Ambush Alley Team Yankee Cold War Commander Sabre Squadron Seven Days to the River Rhine |
UshCha | 15 May 2019 2:33 a.m. PST |
DBM not modern but paved the way for much better movement, endemic disorder: in many ways being the revolution. Without the basic insights into the art of the possible. we would still be trapped in the 6" and 12" style cripplingly limited movement rules. Stargrunt 2 Insights into how rules can be made to flow with command. WRG 1925 to 1950 Probably the least worst of the "modern" as he was not quite so slaved to the Equal points daft games. And also started with credible Suppression systems. Dreadful command and control but at least it had some. Lionel Tars rules in Donald Featherstone's book, way ahead of his time and not understood at the time. Featherstone's rules in "War Games" Dreadful rules still cloned today but he had the excuse he was first and got me started on a lifelong hobby. |
Mkultra99 | 15 May 2019 5:01 a.m. PST |
@Generalstoner49 "Seven Days to the River Rhine"…? Really? Is it that good? It just came out man. It's based off of the Iron Cross engine.. which didn't seem to gather much steam..? Curious as to why you would put that as being impactful on game design? Please elucidate. Or, are you just typing rule book titles that are in front of you? |
Lion in the Stars | 15 May 2019 7:58 a.m. PST |
I should probably add the ancient FASA game, Renegade Legion: Centurion. It has one of the best artillery and air support integrations I've seen, even if it is a scifi game. |
Mobius | 15 May 2019 9:21 a.m. PST |
I played WRG a lot. Fast and easy. A few holes in it. Morale system was a dumpster fire. Played Challenger a few times. Players weren't to sure on the turn system as they seemed to forget sequencing often. Maybe they confused it with WRG. Used my own set, Airland War, since the early '90s. |
Striker | 15 May 2019 10:50 a.m. PST |
Charlie Company, Skirmish Sangin, Force on Force, Stargrunt 2. |
Phrodon | 16 May 2019 9:38 a.m. PST |
I liked Challenger in the day (late 80's). I owned a ton of CnC miniatures. We also played a lot of Mayfair games Engage and Destroy. I tried Harpoon once – in a three room setup. Each player in a room and the ref and table in a third. Really cool but nothing happened. As soon as someone switched on a radar to find the enemy ships, you were blasted out of the water by multiple incoming missiles. I guess realistic but rather dull game in the end. Otherwise I only skirmish in post-WWII now, using The Face of Modern Battle. |