Help support TMP


"Would you game in 54mm if you could?" Topic


57 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Traditional Toy Soldiers Message Board

Back to the Scale Message Board


Action Log

21 Jul 2020 7:05 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions boardCrossposted to Scale board

21 Jul 2020 7:05 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to Traditional Toy Soldiers board

Areas of Interest

General
Toy Gaming

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Memoir '44 Painted U.S. Infantry

Ever wondered how the 'toy soldiers' look when painted?


Featured Profile Article

Disaster for Editor Gwen

There has been a fire, and Personal logo Editor Gwen The Editor of TMP has lost everything.


4,579 hits since 7 May 2019
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

UshCha22 Oct 2020 1:59 a.m. PST

To me 54mm is a model scale not a wargame scale.

I would never be able to safely move pices on a 36ft by 27 ft board even If I could store one and the terrain. Hence NEVER.

Marulaz113 Nov 2020 4:30 p.m. PST

For small, simple toy soldier style games as pictured here like the Battle of Coldstream Bridge I would consider it.

John

Albus Malum09 Jan 2021 6:35 p.m. PST

I would never say never, but at this time I would say definitely NO!!!

I could see myself buying a 6mm army though.
I currently game in 15mm

Personal logo Der Alte Fritz Supporting Member of TMP20 Apr 2021 7:44 p.m. PST

Yes, definitely yes. I built Egyptian and Dervish 54mm armies last year and I had a blast painting the figures (easier to see and paint) and building terrain models.

Hannibal versus the Romans is on my radar for 54mm toy soldier games.

AGregory15 Jun 2021 4:13 p.m. PST

This is a great scale to game in, if you like the aesthetic. We do a lot of "toy soldier" Victorian-era games in 54mm (Armies in Plastic and homecasts), and do some historical skirmish games like Sharp Practice in 54mm for remote games – big figures are easier to see over a web-cam.

With the cost of 28mm figures, 54mm is cheaper, so long as you buy AIP or cast your own, but I think the range and quality of poses is actually worse, despite the scale. They look like what they are – toy soldiers. But a big table full of big figures is a sight to behold! Just take a look at this from the Alte Fritz blog:
link

Johann von Gluhwein16 Jun 2021 9:14 p.m. PST

If you like the toy soldier aesthetic it is an amazing scale to game in.

I think some people get stuck in their heads on how many figures a unit should be and forget to adjust it for the scale. If you like 20 figures as a unit in 28mm, it would be very rigid thinking to expect 10mm gaming to have their units with only 20 figures. Same in reverse.

Nothing wrong with 8-15 castings for a unit. Like in Bob Lehman's example here (All The King's Men rules I think):

Or even less like in Mike Lewis' games of the Bob Cordery's The Portable Wargame:

Dave Crowell09 Mar 2023 4:09 p.m. PST

I have done n the past. For it to be a future project I would need assurances of a regular opponent. Preferably one with a big table. I don't have a great set up for large games at the moment v

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.