Help support TMP


"Scenarios Need Generic OOBs!" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Magazines and Periodicals Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Scenery: Giant Mossy Rocks

Well, they're certainly cheap...


Featured Workbench Article

Paper Mache Cone Trees

Making simple trees from seasonal cones.


Featured Profile Article

Wild Creatures: Wild Animals

Third and last of the Wild Creatures series.


Current Poll


961 hits since 13 Apr 2019
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian13 Apr 2019 10:59 a.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

For a magazine article, should scenario authors provide a generic Order of Battle so that readers can use rules of their own choice for the game? Or do you prefer to see OOBs for a specific ruleset?

51% said "I prefer generic OOBs"
26% said "I prefer to have both."
6% said "I prefer OOB for specific ruleset"

Old Contemptibles15 Apr 2019 10:20 a.m. PST

Well I am the in the 26%. I like both.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.