"Scenarios Need Generic OOBs!" Topic

2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Magazines and Periodicals Message Board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article

Alternative Armies: "Spooky News 2026!"

28mm Victorian Warfare

Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...

Featured Workbench Article

Basing with Two-Part Epoxy

One way to avoid the 'pitcher's mound' effect.

Featured Profile Article

Funeral Report & Thanks

Editor Gwen says 'thank you' one more time.

Current Poll

Most Historically Accurate Historical Novel(s) (Round 1B)

Editor in Chief Bill	13 Apr 2019 9:59 a.m. PST
You were asked – TMP link For a magazine article, should scenario authors provide a generic Order of Battle so that readers can use rules of their own choice for the game? Or do you prefer to see OOBs for a specific ruleset? 51% said "I prefer generic OOBs" 26% said "I prefer to have both." 6% said "I prefer OOB for specific ruleset"
Old Contemptibles	15 Apr 2019 9:20 a.m. PST
Well I am the in the 26%. I like both.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.