"Battle of Cunaxa " Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Product Reviews Message Board Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board
Action Log
04 Apr 2019 4:49 a.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from Ancients Discussion boardCrossposted to Ancients Product Reviews board
Areas of InterestGeneral Ancients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase ArticleHow does coverbinding work?
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 03 Apr 2019 10:01 p.m. PST |
"When the Persian king Darius II died in 404 BCE, the throne of the Achaemenid Persion Empire passed to his eldest son, as normal, who became Artaxerxes II. However his second son, known as Cyrus the Younger, decided to seize the throne for himself, and built up an army with which he moved to challenge his brother in 401 BCE. His army and that of the king's met at Cunaxa, 70km north of Babylon, and both sides enjoyed some success. However during the fighting Cyrus was killed, and so his army dispersed and many mercenaries went home. Artaxerxes went on to rule until 358 BCE, conducting conflicts with Greek states and attempting to reconquer the lost Egyptian province, but with no serious external aggressors most of the king's troubles were ones of internal rebellions. In the West, mention of the Persian Empire tends to be conjure up two famous campaigns; the unsuccessful invasion of Greece (Marathon, Salamis etc.) and the invasion of Alexander the Great, which destroyed the empire. The revolt of Cyrus the Younger and the battle of Cunaxa are roughly equidistance between these two events, and not so well documented, particularly in terms of the makeup of the king's Persian Army. In an earlier age Herodotus tells us there were two regiments of 1,000 men each, which he calls ‘spear-bearers', that were the royal bodyguard and the elite of the army. Ranking below them were the ‘Immortals', 10,000 infantry that were hand-picked as the best of the rest of the army, and so-called because when anyone left or was killed their numbers were always maintained. This was the heart of the army, the best and most professional troops, and the rest were made up of levies (of often poor quality), mercenaries, and some professional troops in the service of one of the satraps (provincial governors)…."
Full review
link Amicalement Armand
|
Shagnasty | 04 Apr 2019 8:58 a.m. PST |
Nice work but they aren't metal. |
Tango01 | 04 Apr 2019 11:52 a.m. PST |
Glad you like them my friend!. (smile) No, they are not….
Amicalement Armand
|
companycmd | 19 Apr 2019 6:13 a.m. PST |
yes good thing they are not metal |
Marc at work | 25 Apr 2019 4:41 a.m. PST |
Hence a posting to the plastics board. Or am I missing something here… |
|