Help support TMP


"What's in a name?" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2011) Message Board

Back to the Wargaming in Canada Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Profile Article

New Computer for Editor Dianna

Time to replace the equipment again!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


946 hits since 16 Mar 2019
©1994-2022 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 13 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
willthepiper16 Mar 2019 9:23 a.m. PST

It seems there was a battle in NDHQ a few years ago between the Government of the day and the RCN over ship names! The Navy successfully pushed back against having RCN ships named after land battles from the War of 1812:

link

For me, ship naming traditions are kind of interesting. I'm not keen on naming ships after people (so the USN insistence on having carriers named for former presidents, or ships named after various other people, never seems quite "right" to me). I like the Age of Sail names, with Greek heroes and gods (Achilles, Juno, Bellorophon and the like), or twentieth century traditions like the Tribal Class just sound right.

I like the comment that the RCN didn't want any of their ships to sound like a winery!

Bozkashi Jones17 Mar 2019 2:24 a.m. PST

I've always liked the Canadian tribal class names which were continued with the post war frigates: Athabaskan, Huron, Iroquois and Algonquin.

It's the main reason I added a couple of them to my UK/NATO 1980s force!

I also like the Greek names, such as those used on the Leander class.

Nick

Chazzmak18 Mar 2019 12:26 p.m. PST

Considering the ineptitude of our governments regarding military affairs, including our veterans, over the last 30 years, I'm surprised they wouldn't want to name ships after disasters. How does "Hindenburg" or "Chicago Fire" sound. More surprising is that they are aware that we have ships!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.