"DBMM - More than Tournaments!" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Product Reviews Message Board Back to the Medieval Product Reviews Message Board Back to the Ancients Product Reviews Message Board
Action Log
01 Mar 2019 12:27 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Crossposted to Medieval Product Reviews boardCrossposted to Renaissance Product Reviews board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 01 Mar 2019 12:26 p.m. PST |
You were asked – TMP link DBMM: Not Just for Tournament Play?18% said "DBMM works well for games involving historical opponents"
7% said "DBMM is best used for tournaments"
1% said "DBMM is too complex for historical games" |
| aynsley683 | 03 Mar 2019 5:46 a.m. PST |
Then 65% said something else. I don't think these polls, or rather the results posted recently on the ancients page have the correct questions to begin with to make the polls worth while. |
| kodiakblair | 03 Mar 2019 8:22 a.m. PST |
Something's not right aynsley683. "You like DBA 3.0" 62% other/no opinion.
"You have 10 or less DBA armies" 58% don't play DBA The way the results are given would lead folks to believe DBX is much more popular than it is. |
|
