
"Battle of Stamford Bridge - AAR" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the What I Did This Week Message Board Back to the Medieval Battle Reports Message Board Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the Wargaming in the United Kingdom Message Board Back to the Dark Ages Message Board Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Featured Profile Article Wargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.
Featured Book Review
|
EricThe Shed | 26 Feb 2019 11:25 p.m. PST |
Finally managed to put part of my new Dark Ages collection on the table for a refight of Stamford Bridge 1066 Full report on the blog with lots of pictures link
cheers |
Louie N | 26 Feb 2019 11:50 p.m. PST |
A wonderful looking game. Thank you |
Fish | 27 Feb 2019 12:39 a.m. PST |
|
Oberlindes Sol LIC  | 27 Feb 2019 9:41 a.m. PST |
|
Borderguy190 | 27 Feb 2019 9:44 a.m. PST |
So many minis! That looks fantastic. |
22ndFoot | 27 Feb 2019 11:51 a.m. PST |
Eric, Great looking game. Riverlevels.uk on the Derwent at Stamford Bridge, discussing the approximately 7m river level, notes possibly importantly "[t]he levels for this location are measured relative to sea level, not relative to the riverbed. The levels shown here do not, therefore, necessarily represent the actual depth of the water." link The current north end of the bridge is approximately 10m above sea level, so approximately ten feet above the usual river surface, and the monument 17m ASL. link The river Derwent has a fairly extensive flood plain which has been constrained over the centuries. So the river may not really be 7m deep around the bridge and would not have been in 1066. So you probably had it right when you made it fordable as some of the accounts suggest. Cheers, Jon |
Ponder | 27 Feb 2019 1:19 p.m. PST |
|
EricThe Shed | 28 Feb 2019 10:15 p.m. PST |
thanks for the comments guys…special thank you to Jon |
22ndFoot | 01 Mar 2019 1:25 p.m. PST |
My pleasure. It's amazing what you can find online in an idle half hour when something piques your interest. |
|