Help support TMP


"Same Battle, Different Rules?" Topic


18 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Action Log

30 Jan 2019 8:08 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to Wargaming in General board

02 Nov 2019 5:02 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Current Poll


480 hits since 30 Jan 2019
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian30 Jan 2019 8:08 p.m. PST

Do you like to play the same battle, using different rulesets?

Old Contemptibles Supporting Member of TMP30 Jan 2019 9:18 p.m. PST

I have played the same battle in a different period, with different rules and figures. I did Placenoit with a Napoleonic set of rules. Later I did Placenoit with 1870 armies using "They Died For Glory."

link

Dexter Ward31 Jan 2019 1:10 a.m. PST

Sure. We've fought Plataea with WRG, DBA, DBM, Field of Glory, Sword & SPear and To the Strongest. We've fought Albuera with Shako, Fire & Fury Napoleonic, Lasalle. Hondeghem 1940 with Rapid Fire, IABSM and Battlefront WW2.
A good scenario works in any rules, and it is often interesting to see how different rules work out.

advocate31 Jan 2019 1:22 a.m. PST

I have done so in the past. Not recently.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 3:34 a.m. PST

I've done it. It's a good way to test rules.

jurgenation Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 4:34 a.m. PST

I have done it,to test rules out.

Personal logo Shaun Travers Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 4:53 a.m. PST

Yes, love it. But not done it recently.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 5:25 a.m. PST

No aversion to this, but it is not something I seek out to do.

We replay a lot of battles. A good scenario should have the depth for replay. When I write scenarios, they usually have options and pseudo random conditions in the setup, as well as variants.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 5:36 a.m. PST

Like etotheipi, have done it but something we try to do

DisasterWargamer Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 5:40 a.m. PST

Concur about a great way to test rules

Stryderg31 Jan 2019 5:55 a.m. PST

At a convention, one game was a Battle of Peleliu using 6mm Command Decision rules. The next table over was my game of a Battle at Peleliu using 20mm Nuts! rules. The action on our tabletop occurred in one hex on the other table.

Whirlwind31 Jan 2019 5:59 a.m. PST

Yes, I do it a fair bit.

deanoware31 Jan 2019 7:07 a.m. PST

Something I have thought of doing for some time.

rustymusket Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 8:55 a.m. PST

It sounds interesting, but I have never done it.

21eRegt31 Jan 2019 9:17 a.m. PST

Only a couple of times, as a trial of rules under consideration.

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP31 Jan 2019 10:07 a.m. PST

Well, with a collection of 100 Days campaign armies, I'll be playing those battles with whatever Napoleonic rules I'm trying out.

oldnorthstate31 Jan 2019 10:51 a.m. PST

At Cold Wars on Friday night Chris Hughes will be running a 28mm Tarawa beach landing game using beautifully done terrain boards and using Chain of Command. I will run the game the next morning using Bolt Action…it will be interesting to compare and contrast now the game plays.

surdu200501 Feb 2019 1:32 p.m. PST

The HAWKs have been fighting the same Napoleonic battle with three different sets of rules at the HMGS East conventions going back a year or two. Interestingly enough, the outcomes seem pretty similar.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.