Help support TMP


"Four Reasons Why Hybrid Electric Drive Would Be" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

C-in-C's 1:285 Soviet SAU122

Need some armored artillery vehicles?


Featured Workbench Article

Painting More of the Corporate Babes

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian says he's pretty happy with these babes...


Featured Profile Article

Magnets: N52 Versus N42

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian wants to know if you can tell the difference between weaker and stronger magnets with 3mm aircraft.


Featured Book Review


778 hits since 30 Jan 2019
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0130 Jan 2019 4:13 p.m. PST

….Good for the Navy's Future Frigate


"The U.S. Navy is moving ahead smartly to acquire a new frigate or FFG(X). Last year, it awarded five contracts for conceptual designs to Austal USA, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, Fincantieri Marine and Huntington Ingalls. To shorten the time between design and production, the Navy required that the FFG(X) be based on an existing ship already in production either in the U.S. or overseas. The current plan is to finalize the frigate's requirements in the next few months, release a formal Request for Proposals around mid-year and downselect to a single winner for the 20-ship program in 2020.

The five companies competing for the FFG(X) face a number of challenges in developing their designs. The Navy has articulated a demanding set of requirements. It wants a multi-mission ship that can contribute meaningfully in a high-end combat environment involving anti-submarine (ASW), air and missile defense (AAW), and surface warfare (SUW) missions. At the same time, the Navy has been pushing hard to lower the projected costs for the FFG(X), publicly announcing that it had reduced the projected average cost for the new frigate by $150 USD million, or nearly 20%. Also, the competitors are inevitably constrained by the limits of the characteristics of the existing ship designs on which their proposals will be based…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

doug redshirt30 Jan 2019 7:21 p.m. PST

Getting a ship to do one thing really well is easy, to get it to do multiple things not so easy or cheap.

Lion in the Stars31 Jan 2019 12:18 a.m. PST

Well, we already (at least sorta) have the tech figured out in the Zumwalt drivetrain, so basically using about half the Zumwalt powerplant would be pretty solid.

And it would give enough of a production run to get the entire system cost a little cheaper.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.