/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Four Reasons Why Hybrid Electric Drive Would Be" Topic

 Help support TMP


"Four Reasons Why Hybrid Electric Drive Would Be" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Dreamblade Repainted

Hundvig Fezian is not a real big fan of pre-painted minis, and he positively despises randomly-packed "collectable" ones - so why is he writing this article?


Featured Profile Article

Checking Out a Boardgame, Episode II

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks for scenario material in a World War IV boardgame.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


690 hits since 30 Jan 2019
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0130 Jan 2019 3:13 p.m. PST

….Good for the Navy's Future Frigate


"The U.S. Navy is moving ahead smartly to acquire a new frigate or FFG(X). Last year, it awarded five contracts for conceptual designs to Austal USA, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, Fincantieri Marine and Huntington Ingalls. To shorten the time between design and production, the Navy required that the FFG(X) be based on an existing ship already in production either in the U.S. or overseas. The current plan is to finalize the frigate's requirements in the next few months, release a formal Request for Proposals around mid-year and downselect to a single winner for the 20-ship program in 2020.

The five companies competing for the FFG(X) face a number of challenges in developing their designs. The Navy has articulated a demanding set of requirements. It wants a multi-mission ship that can contribute meaningfully in a high-end combat environment involving anti-submarine (ASW), air and missile defense (AAW), and surface warfare (SUW) missions. At the same time, the Navy has been pushing hard to lower the projected costs for the FFG(X), publicly announcing that it had reduced the projected average cost for the new frigate by $150 USD million, or nearly 20%. Also, the competitors are inevitably constrained by the limits of the characteristics of the existing ship designs on which their proposals will be based…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

doug redshirt30 Jan 2019 6:21 p.m. PST

Getting a ship to do one thing really well is easy, to get it to do multiple things not so easy or cheap.

Lion in the Stars30 Jan 2019 11:18 p.m. PST

Well, we already (at least sorta) have the tech figured out in the Zumwalt drivetrain, so basically using about half the Zumwalt powerplant would be pretty solid.

And it would give enough of a production run to get the entire system cost a little cheaper.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.