Help support TMP


"Battle Of Hastings Eye Candy" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tactica Medieval Rulebook


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Infantry

wodger Fezian begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,039 hits since 17 Jan 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Dervel Fezian17 Jan 2019 5:39 a.m. PST

Just some eye candy from a recent convention running the Battle of Hastings.

I have run this battle over a dozen time now, victory ratio is roughly 50-50. This last session saw two Saxon victories so a slight slant to Saxon's winning more often than the Normans. This is partially attributed to the Norman command being much more difficult to play, i.e. the Saxons just need to be patient and the Normans really need to work their combined arms to disrupt the Saxon line before charging home. If the Normans charge in without doing it, they usually get repulsed often with severe consequences.

The more I play the Triumph rules the more I appreciate how well they can recreate a great historical battle on the table top with such an elegant and streamlined system.

McWong7317 Jan 2019 5:45 a.m. PST

Brilliant work. How did you do the table?

skipper John17 Jan 2019 7:46 a.m. PST

Great looking game!

Pan Marek17 Jan 2019 9:04 a.m. PST

Faeger!

Dervel Fezian17 Jan 2019 4:27 p.m. PST

@McWong, the building of the battlefield was in this thread:

TMP link


Thanks guys, I am happy with the battlefield, it will take a tour of a couple conventions this year and then be in storage for a little while.

Stew art Supporting Member of TMP17 Jan 2019 4:35 p.m. PST

Looks like Hastings alright! Great looking game.

coopman17 Jan 2019 7:42 p.m. PST

Nice looking game. Thanks.

MSU John17 Jan 2019 7:48 p.m. PST

Played in this at a local convention in Michigan. Terrain really captured my mental picture of the field, tactical challenge was excellent (we were Normans), and the rules were easy and captured the period. Excellent!

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP18 Jan 2019 3:21 p.m. PST

Terrific scenery, based on my memories of the battlefield.

EricThe Shed21 Jan 2019 2:48 p.m. PST

great pictures and thanks for table build – certainly giving me some thought for my hastings table

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP22 Jan 2019 12:03 p.m. PST

Very nice!

French Wargame Holidays27 Jan 2019 1:43 p.m. PST

Most excellent

Cheers
Matt

Lewisgunner27 Jan 2019 2:32 p.m. PST

We ran a similar large game at the Society of Ancients Conference in 2016. We created a small rule which meant that any Saxon unit that defeated or was near the defeat ir pull back if a Norman unit had to throw . In that case it added its casualties to a d6 number and if that exceeded its fighting value then it had to pursue for two moves and would end disordered. This had the advantage of making it easier for a fyrd unit with a fighting value if say 4 or 5 to do an uncontrolled advance than a housecarl unit with a fighting value of 7. Pulling out a unit or two this way posed an interesting problem for the English commander as he could either pull the units back in oater moves or advance the rest of his units ( on a basis of a wing or the centre as a command) and support the attack. In our game the Normans sensibly crumbled the Saxons from the flank and tried to avoud charging Harold himself until he was well weakened.

Dervel Fezian30 Jan 2019 7:51 a.m. PST

The only special rules for my game were that any Saxon unit (other than the skirmishers) need an extra command point spent to go back up the hill.

i.e. The Triumph rules already have a great mechanism the Normans can use for pulling the Saxons off the hill with their lighter troops. This command point rule simply sped up the process so that what would have happened eventually happened faster. The Saxons get two or three units pulled and then roll a low command point roll, they can't pull everyone back into line. The Saxons then have to choose between advancing the whole line to support or letting over eager units get cut up unsupported.


In my opinion this give and take really helped recreate the "historical" feel of the battle. The light horse and the skirmishers taunting the Saxon warriors off the hill and out of formation. The knights poised to take advantage of the break in the line. The hill setting with secured flanks also gives the Saxons a very good chance at victory against any but the most cagey of Norman opponents :)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.