"How the Vicksburg Siege May Have Turned the Tide " Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article A Civil War boardgame is adapted to miniature wargaming.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01  | 08 Jan 2019 2:26 p.m. PST |
…of the Civil War "Southern newspapers hurled these sentiments at Confederate General John C. Pemberton after he surrendered the fortress of Vicksburg—the key to controlling the Mississippi River during the Civil War. But were they justified in their accusations? Today I'm talking with Dr. Samuel Mitcham, author of Vicksburg: The Bloody Siege that Turned the Tide of the Civil War. He argues that these newspapers—and history itself—have wrongly marred Pemberton's legacy. Some of the myths he argues against are that Pemberton's indecisiveness delayed the aid Vicksburg needed, when in fact he had been urgently requesting reinforcements, stationed nearby, but his commanding general repeatedly ignored him due to a petty grudge…."
Main page
link
Amicalement
Armand
|
| John the Greater | 09 Jan 2019 11:12 a.m. PST |
It was to be expected that any unsuccessful general in the Civil War would be subject to the wrath of the press. The fact that Pemberton was from Pennsylvania only made things worse for him. As for blame, there was plenty to go around among the Confederate commanders in that theater of war. A whole library of books has been written on the subject. |
| Tango01 | 09 Jan 2019 11:46 a.m. PST |
|
|
completes his initial Union force in 1:72nd scale.