Help support TMP


"Visualizing The Military Imbalance Between China And Taiwan" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Amazon's Santa with Gun Pack

You wanted more photos of the Santa Claws Gang? Here is Santa and two of his companions.


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


565 hits since 5 Jan 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0105 Jan 2019 3:46 p.m. PST

"In a speech marking 40 years since the improvement in ties with Taiwan, Chinese President Xi Jinping has has once again called for peaceful reunification, also warning that China reserves the the right to use force.

Although it is self-governed and de-facto independent, Taiwan has never formally declared independence. Xi also said that reunification is "an inevitable requirement for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese people" and that his government "reserves the option of taking all necessary measures" against outside interference with peaceful reunification…."

picture

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Col Durnford05 Jan 2019 4:13 p.m. PST

Not a hopeful balance. Then again, I seem to remember an old joke about Germany and the Swiss. Bismarck said something like "You (the Swiss) have an army of 20,000 men, what if I sent 40,000 Germans against you?" The Swiss ambassador's reply was "Each man would fire twice."

Rudysnelson05 Jan 2019 5:25 p.m. PST

Well, it is closer than I thought. The transport capabilities will be a major factor. With a naval strategy of attacking transport ships and not combat ships the Taiwan army would severely limit Red Chinese reinforcement and expansion capabilities.

The Taiwan strategy would be defensive so many of the disparages are not crucial. The Chinese would still have military responsibilities in other region while Taiwan would not. So the numbers in manpower is closer still.

Oberlindes Sol LIC Supporting Member of TMP05 Jan 2019 6:32 p.m. PST

PRC has about a 3:1 advantage in the number of fighter aircraft. Query whether the PRC could actually get and keep all of them in the air at the same time. Moreover, if the ROC fighters are technologically superior, they may defeat the remaining PRC fighters. Then PRC air and water transports become targets for those same ROC fighters. That will at least delay an invasion.

PRC frigates and destroyers will provide air defense to the tank transports, so ROC should probably get a few more submarines so that they can destroy more ships simultaneously.

Thresher0105 Jan 2019 7:54 p.m. PST

Without US support, I suspect Taiwan is lost.

Waco Joe06 Jan 2019 8:02 a.m. PST

Would not surprise me if the unspoken strategy for Taiwan is a massive attack on the dam system of China. Is it worth it to China to try to gain militarily what another few generations of demographics will yield peacefully?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.