"Visualizing The Military Imbalance Between China And Taiwan" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset Rating:
Featured Showcase ArticleYou wanted more photos of the Santa Claws Gang? Here is Santa and two of his companions.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 05 Jan 2019 3:46 p.m. PST |
"In a speech marking 40 years since the improvement in ties with Taiwan, Chinese President Xi Jinping has has once again called for peaceful reunification, also warning that China reserves the the right to use force. Although it is self-governed and de-facto independent, Taiwan has never formally declared independence. Xi also said that reunification is "an inevitable requirement for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese people" and that his government "reserves the option of taking all necessary measures" against outside interference with peaceful reunification…."
Main page link Amicalement Armand
|
Col Durnford | 05 Jan 2019 4:13 p.m. PST |
Not a hopeful balance. Then again, I seem to remember an old joke about Germany and the Swiss. Bismarck said something like "You (the Swiss) have an army of 20,000 men, what if I sent 40,000 Germans against you?" The Swiss ambassador's reply was "Each man would fire twice." |
Rudysnelson | 05 Jan 2019 5:25 p.m. PST |
Well, it is closer than I thought. The transport capabilities will be a major factor. With a naval strategy of attacking transport ships and not combat ships the Taiwan army would severely limit Red Chinese reinforcement and expansion capabilities. The Taiwan strategy would be defensive so many of the disparages are not crucial. The Chinese would still have military responsibilities in other region while Taiwan would not. So the numbers in manpower is closer still. |
Oberlindes Sol LIC | 05 Jan 2019 6:32 p.m. PST |
PRC has about a 3:1 advantage in the number of fighter aircraft. Query whether the PRC could actually get and keep all of them in the air at the same time. Moreover, if the ROC fighters are technologically superior, they may defeat the remaining PRC fighters. Then PRC air and water transports become targets for those same ROC fighters. That will at least delay an invasion. PRC frigates and destroyers will provide air defense to the tank transports, so ROC should probably get a few more submarines so that they can destroy more ships simultaneously. |
Thresher01 | 05 Jan 2019 7:54 p.m. PST |
Without US support, I suspect Taiwan is lost. |
Waco Joe | 06 Jan 2019 8:02 a.m. PST |
Would not surprise me if the unspoken strategy for Taiwan is a massive attack on the dam system of China. Is it worth it to China to try to gain militarily what another few generations of demographics will yield peacefully? |
|