"2019 Gaming Preview" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleESLO Terrain explains about their range of modular buildings.
Featured Profile ArticleMal Wright journeys to and from the Australian national convention - and tells us what he thinks of panicking tank hordes and flat terrain!
Current Poll
|
Don Cossack | 31 Dec 2018 6:26 p.m. PST |
|
Stosstruppen | 01 Jan 2019 8:20 a.m. PST |
Nice write up, you might try Grande Armee for your Napoleonics, if you have both sides based the same it should be a problem using your basing. Honours of War is a fun game. I have played it all of once but enjoyed it very much and wouldn't hesitate to play again. |
Tony S | 01 Jan 2019 12:14 p.m. PST |
I'd have to agree with your assessment of Polemos. I tried the GNW and the Napoleonic sets a couple of times, and it just didn't work for me, despite me really wanting them to! (One sticking point was the lack of a command radius. Commanders can sit on the rear table edge and merrily control their brigades. That's what I remember anyway). Grande Armee is all right, but quite honestly I really prefer "Blucher" by the same author. Especially when you use the pre battle campaign game; that REALLY captures the feel of Napoleonic warfare. Well, so do the tactical rules. Always quite playable solo – just convert the hidden pip roll to a roll against a target number that increases by one every time you succeed. Your turn is over when you reach that limit. Honours of War in indeed great fun! I've played it quite often, and always enjoy it. One of the best – if not the best – of the Osprey blue book rules. That said, we tend to reduce the effectiveness of irregulars in these rules. They seem too powerful as written. Formations changes and artillery initially seemed a bit too "Napoleonic" but I held my nose, and I do admit it works, and still feels proper. Except that in our group, no one ever limbers the guns to move; just prolong them. The movement allowance for prolonging guns is quite liberal. |
Must Contain Minis | 01 Jan 2019 11:17 p.m. PST |
Thanks for sharing this interesting post. |
Don Cossack | 02 Jan 2019 12:57 p.m. PST |
Thanks, everybody for having a look! I've had several recommendations for Honours of War now. I'll keep an eye out for the skirmisher strength issue (I don't doubt it, either -- seems a common problem). Formations in the SYW is another common problem. You should just about expect it. |
|