"The U.S. Infantry Is Carrying More Weight Than Ever" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article Sometimes, you have to take it apart, so you can put it back together again.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 29 Dec 2018 1:02 p.m. PST |
"Technology was supposed to be the solution. Instead, it added to the problem. In this era of computerized conflict, dominated by cyberwarfare, laser weapons, and piloting drones from halfway around the world, it can be easy to overlook the importance of a soldier's own muscle power. Despite the relentless march of technology—and in some ways, because of it—soldiers on the march are carrying more weight on their backs than ever before, even going back to the days of swords and armor. What the heck happened? Over the last decade, hyped technologies such as robotic mules and wearable exoskeletons promised to free up soldiers from hauling so much gear. Instead, the demands of the modern battlefield only increased the load….."
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
| Sir Walter Rlyeh | 31 Dec 2018 11:26 a.m. PST |
Oh, equipment! I thought you were talking about the fact that an average size American male now ways 195.7 pounds. I myself am 20 pounds heavier than I was when I got out of Infantry training at Fort Benning when I was 17. Of course, I am now 52. |
| Tango01 | 31 Dec 2018 11:43 a.m. PST |
|
|
wants to know if you can tell the difference between weaker and stronger magnets with 3mm aircraft.
