Help support TMP


"Confederate Skirmishing" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Product Reviews Message Board

Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

De Bellis Americanus Civilis


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

CSS Mississippi

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes a Confederate river ironclad.


Featured Workbench Article

U.S.S. Marmora Tinclad

Damaged in an ocean crossing, Bay Area Yard's 1:600 scale U.S.S. Marmora finally appears in Workbench.


1,860 hits since 18 Dec 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0118 Dec 2018 9:56 p.m. PST

"You could argue that skirmishing is as old as war, but in the era of massed ranks of firearm infantry the advantages of skirmishing or ‘open order' were recognised in the 18th century. By the time of the Civil War all armies had long had light infantry for the task, and in fact all troops were expected to fulfil the light infantry role if required. Nevertheless the need for specialist skirmishers was recognised and in 1862 Congress in Richmond passed an act to authorise battalions of sharpshooters, which were initially filled from suitable recruits from existing Confederate regiments rather than directly from the population. By the campaign season of that year there were sharpshooter battalions from many of the southern states, and more were to follow. Any unit operating in open order would usually divide the men into four-man teams that would operate in a less rigid manner than the ordinary soldiers, making use of cover as available, and hopefully incurring far less casualties than the solid blocks of troops still being used during the war.

This is a most unusual set, because while it has a large number of different poses, no one is standing up straight. Skirmishing did not necessarily mean crouching or lying on the ground, but as there are already many sets of infantry standing it seems Strelets decided to concentrate solely on men trying to make themselves as small a target as possible, perhaps operating from behind cover or simply in the open but keeping as low as possible. The poses are a highly varied and often energetic selection, with men kneeling, crouching or on the ground in all manner of different ways, and we really loved them. A lot of them are in the act of firing or reloading, and a couple seem to be moving forward. The poses look really natural and so appropriate, and there are no particularly bad choices here in our view. Two of them are reloading their muskets – hard to do while crouching or lying on the ground, but it certainly happened. Weakest of the bunch is the second figure in the fourth row, who is firing while lying on the ground. This would be OK except that only his legs are on the ground, and his trunk, arms and head are well off the ground, but the figure is front heavy and cannot be made to stay upright. Also he is firing high, so would best be used against a sloping piece of cover – or perhaps simply uphill…."

picture


picture


picture


picture


picture


Full Review here

link

Amicalement
Armand

shirleys painting19 Dec 2018 9:32 a.m. PST

TL;DR a bunch of bad figures.

Tango0119 Dec 2018 11:18 a.m. PST

Glup…!

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo PaulCollins Supporting Member of TMP19 Dec 2018 8:46 p.m. PST

What is TL;DR? The review seems to ndicate that they don't feel that they are especially bad and you haven't really provided anything to support the assertion. I am not saying that you are incorrect, but there is also nothing to make me think the assertion has merit.

Tango0120 Dec 2018 11:24 a.m. PST

I like them!.


Amicalement
Armand

d effinger20 Dec 2018 2:06 p.m. PST

Pretty bad poses and sculpts.

dantheman22 Dec 2018 6:49 a.m. PST

Poses and sculpts are decent if not great. I would have little need for a skirmishing set for wargaming though.

Pauls Bods23 Dec 2018 2:54 a.m. PST

Not all the poses are that bad. I´d remove the flag from the dead Standard bearer and use him as a casualty and the two laying poses are "clumpy"

I would have little need for a skirmishing set for wargaming though.

Agreed. Their previous sets were excellent for wargaming. At some Point I plan to get the set and include most of them into firing lines…or add to my rule set and use one or two as actual skirmishers.

Does TL;DR mean, Too Long; Didn´t Read?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.