"Focusing on Sedgemoor Part 1" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Gallery Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
|
| Tango01 | 06 Dec 2018 10:08 p.m. PST |
"The Battle of Sedgemoor, July 6 1685 stimulates a variety of responses when discussed amongst wargamers. I almost added – and the wider population but realized how unlikely such an occurrence might be! Who actually knows much about it? (or cares!)…."
Main page
link
Amicalement
Armand |
robert piepenbrink  | 07 Dec 2018 7:20 a.m. PST |
You know, he's got a point about the campaign setting, but I wouldn't have gone as far as "perfect." Here's why:
1. The shortage of cavalry he sees as an advantage, I don't. Goes with the lack of troop types, especially for Monmouth. A wargame campaign goes to battles, and there aren't enough troop types to make it interesting.
2. It's only historical if Monmouth loses, in the particular sense that we only know how Monmouth's forces look starting out. If Monmouth wins a couple of battles--and if he doesn't, it will be a very short campaign--he's not going to have an army consisting of people with scythe blades in civilian clothes. He's going to go to--what? At that point we really need a different miniature army, and it's going to be guesswork. But there may be answers to both objections. I shall be interested to see what the League has to say going forward. |
| Tango01 | 07 Dec 2018 12:36 p.m. PST |
|
 Flashman14 | 07 Dec 2018 4:15 p.m. PST |
I love those resin? hedge rows. Anyone know where those can be purchased? |
| Tango01 | 08 Dec 2018 11:40 a.m. PST |
Glad you like them my good friend!.
Amicalement
Armand
|
|
