"Pokpung-Ho tank" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Another episode of Identity That Figure!
Featured Workbench Article Two of Hasslefree's Adventurers venture to Serbia...
Featured Profile Article The Editor heads for Vicksburg...
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| Tango01 | 01 Dec 2018 3:59 p.m. PST |
"The P'okp'ung-ho or spelled Pokpung-ho (Chosŏn'gŭl: Æødzȣ; Hanja: øìù¦ûÜ) is a North Korean main battle tank (MBT) developed in the 1990s. The tank may incorporate technology found in the T-62, T-72, Type 88 and Ch'onma-ho MBTs.[6][3] Outside parties codename the tank M-2002 because the tank went through performance trials on February 16, 2002 (therefore being officially confirmed by outside sources), although the tank may have been in existence since 1992…."
From wiki Nice!
Main page
ghqmodels.com/store/nk4.html
Amicalement
Armand |
 Legion 4   | 01 Dec 2018 4:54 p.m. PST |
Looks like a target …  |
| Tango01 | 02 Dec 2018 3:05 p.m. PST |
|
| Zephyr1 | 02 Dec 2018 9:59 p.m. PST |
The name translates to "Our Glorious Leader wanted this tank, so we built it for him." |
| shirleys painting | 03 Dec 2018 12:41 p.m. PST |
Great looking model by GHQ. But you know that on the modern battlefield, that tank is so much Derp. Target indeed, |
| Legion 4 | 03 Dec 2018 4:33 p.m. PST |
|
| Tango01 | 04 Dec 2018 11:31 a.m. PST |
Glad you like it my friend. Amicalement
Armand |
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 04 Dec 2018 7:42 p.m. PST |
Poopoo-ing the Pokpungho? That's a good one cus it is a PoS tank I suppose. |
| Legion 4 | 05 Dec 2018 1:03 a.m. PST |
I'm sure like most NoKo equipment it wouldn't be too much of a problem. This isn't 1950 … US & ROK forces have many effective Anti-Armor systems. From man-packed, on up to various aircraft ordinance, etc. I'm confident TOWs would make short work of it, etc. |
|
