"The M-50 'Bounder' " Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleAnother episode of Identity That Figure!
Featured Profile ArticleAmmunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 15 Nov 2018 3:29 p.m. PST |
Fine line…. "It was as a desperate attempt to produce a Soviet supersonic-bomber. Only two prototypes were built. They were very big, cool looking and had very under-performing engines. But; Boris and Natasha (after large amounts of Vodka were consumed) managed to convince an editor for 'Aviation Week' that the 'Bounder' was really a Nuclear-Powered strategic bomber."
Amicalement Armand |
Thresher01 | 15 Nov 2018 3:53 p.m. PST |
Masters of over the top lies, and hyperbole. |
20thmaine | 15 Nov 2018 4:40 p.m. PST |
Who we talkin' about now ? |
Major Mike | 15 Nov 2018 7:08 p.m. PST |
Looks like a F-104 on steroids. |
Patrick Sexton | 16 Nov 2018 9:46 a.m. PST |
I had a model of this as a kid. It was hanging in the toy department at Marshall Fields (the Downtown Chicago one) I most likely did some whining and my Grandma bought it (along with a Bear and a Yak-25) as an early birthday present. they were destroyed by my younger brothers by summer's end. FYI, my Grandma was awesome. |
Tango01 | 16 Nov 2018 11:52 a.m. PST |
|
ScottS | 16 Nov 2018 3:24 p.m. PST |
|
khanscom | 17 Nov 2018 7:18 a.m. PST |
Gotta love this quote from "The World's Worst Aircraft": "…an outstanding failure which revealed an embarrassing lack of understanding of the problems of high- speed flight." |
|