Mr. Mead's analysis is dead wrong, and completely backwards.
I recall Vladimir and his generals and other spokespeople: threatening to nuke half of Europe; sending in strategic, nuclear capable bombers and fighters to do practice runs over Western Europe at supersonic speeds with transponders turned off; invading and attacking Georgia; invading and annexing Crimea; invading Eastern Ukraine and supplying troops and heavy weapons to the guerrillas there; assassinating opponents; breaking the INF treaty with their new, Iskander mobile missiles deployed in the Baltic region and other locations; sending nuclear capable bombers and fighters close to the USA and Japan as well, etc., etc..
But, it's Trump's fault for restarting the Cold War?
How did he force Vladimir and the Russians to do all of the above while he was working on his real estate business?
When did he have the time?
He must have tremendous powers of mind control.
I guess on the plus side, ignoring the real human and financial costs of the above conflicts, it does make for interesting challenges to deal with him effectively, and for wargamers in general, since there are lots of possible scenarios and real conflicts to play out on the tabletop.
You can bet in some countries, professional wargamers and soldiers/generals are doing the same thing, with far bigger budgets, and stakes on the table, should they get things wrong with their analyses, or lose.
A pity a "historian" gets the issue so wrong.
I'm surprised the WSJ would print such drivel.