"82nd Airborne Div. getting Marine LAV-25's" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2009-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
|
| 28mm Fanatik | 30 Oct 2018 3:23 p.m. PST |
Shouldn't it be the other way around? link |
| Lion in the Stars | 30 Oct 2018 5:04 p.m. PST |
The US Army doesn't use LAV-25s, though. Kinda surprised that the 82nd didn't get Stryker Dragoons. |
| Ashokmarine | 30 Oct 2018 6:02 p.m. PST |
Cool vehicle..funny they got leftovers though |
GROSSMAN  | 30 Oct 2018 6:57 p.m. PST |
Isn't the Striker too big for airborne ops? |
| Prof Pate | 31 Oct 2018 11:33 a.m. PST |
Grossman you hit the nail. Yes almost as immobile as an M1AA. Stryker is appalling waste IMO. Should have all had LAV. |
| Lion in the Stars | 31 Oct 2018 10:21 p.m. PST |
? Strykers, without the slat armor, are C130-transportable. You do need to dismount the RWS, though, that's too tall to fit up the ramp. |
| Andy ONeill | 01 Nov 2018 7:28 a.m. PST |
Is slat armour bolted on? |
| 28mm Fanatik | 01 Nov 2018 9:02 a.m. PST |
The army evaluated both. The LAV was chosen over the Stryker because they could fit one more in a C-17. link |
| Garand | 02 Nov 2018 7:02 a.m. PST |
IIRC the Styker is air transportable in a C-130 with a waiver. So its an issue where they can JUST get it in… Damon. |
|
