"US Navy’s New SSN(X) Attack Sub To Be Faster, ..." Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleAs the holiday season approaches, overstock toys of previous years show up in the dollar stores.
Featured Workbench ArticleI supplied Stronty Girl with some 'babes', and she did the rest...
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 22 Oct 2018 9:45 p.m. PST |
…More Lethal – And More Expensive. "The Navy's next class fast attack submarine will be designed for a return to blue-water great power competition, where the ability to support forces ashore is less important than operating in the open ocean hunting rival submarines, according to an analysis of the Navy's 30 Year shipbuilding plan conducted by Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
The Navy plans to start purchasing this new class of submarine in 2034. Previously the SSN(X) class were assumed to be a successor to the current Virginia-class submarine, complete with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM) – a vertical launch system that increases the number of Tomahawk-sized weapons from 12 to 40 – and other acoustic and technological design improvements, according to the CBO analysis released Thursday….." Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Lion in the Stars | 23 Oct 2018 2:20 p.m. PST |
Hrm. Going more towards the Seawolf design than the Virginia… Well, hopefully with what we have learned about building the Virginias, we can get that unit cost down. One thing I hate is that the CBO always includes development costs with the unit costs. Those are two separate things, and the Development costs are sunk, there is no way to get that money back, at all, ever. |
|