/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "US Navy’s New SSN(X) Attack Sub To Be Faster, ..." Topic

 Help support TMP


"US Navy’s New SSN(X) Attack Sub To Be Faster, ..." Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Beer and Pretzels Skirmish (BAPS)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Trucks From Hell

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian struggles to complete his SISI truck force.


Featured Workbench Article

Acrylic Flight Stands from Litko

What flight stand for our Hurricanes?


Featured Profile Article

Iraq 2005

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian plays Ambush Alley at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


773 hits since 22 Oct 2018
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP22 Oct 2018 9:45 p.m. PST

…More Lethal – And More Expensive.


"The Navy's next class fast attack submarine will be designed for a return to blue-water great power competition, where the ability to support forces ashore is less important than operating in the open ocean hunting rival submarines, according to an analysis of the Navy's 30 Year shipbuilding plan conducted by Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

The Navy plans to start purchasing this new class of submarine in 2034. Previously the SSN(X) class were assumed to be a successor to the current Virginia-class submarine, complete with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM) – a vertical launch system that increases the number of Tomahawk-sized weapons from 12 to 40 – and other acoustic and technological design improvements, according to the CBO analysis released Thursday….."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars23 Oct 2018 2:20 p.m. PST

Hrm.

Going more towards the Seawolf design than the Virginia… Well, hopefully with what we have learned about building the Virginias, we can get that unit cost down.

One thing I hate is that the CBO always includes development costs with the unit costs. Those are two separate things, and the Development costs are sunk, there is no way to get that money back, at all, ever.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.