Help support TMP


"What Edward Luttwak Doesn't Know About Ancient China" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tactica


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Gladiators & Centaurs

Blue Table Painting paints some of the latest releases from Bronze Age Miniatures.


Featured Profile Article

Wild Creatures: Dinosaurs

Four and last of the Wild Creatures series.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


912 hits since 11 Oct 2018
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2018 3:39 p.m. PST

… (Or a Short History of Han-Xiongnu Relations.

"A few weeks ago a friend passed along one of the least correct essays I have ever had the misfortune to read. It was written by Edward Luttwak, secret agent author of classic titles in the field of strategic studies like Coup D¡¯¨¦tat: A Practical Handbook, Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, and Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. I was disappointed to find out that this particular piece, published in the Hoover Institute's online magazine Strategika, closely mirrors a passage in Mr. Luttwak's most recent best-seller, The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy. In it Luttwak suggests contemporary Chinese foreign policy follows a pattern first seen in the foreign relations of the Han Dynasty two millennia ago [1]. To quote:

What is peculiar to China¡¯s political culture, and of very great contemporary relevance is the centrality within it of a very specific doctrine on how to bring powerful foreigners¡ªindeed foreigners initially more powerful than the empire¡ªinto a tributary relationship. Specialists concur that this doctrine emerged from the very protracted (3rd century BCE to 1st century CE) but ultimately successful struggle with the Xiongn¨² (ÐÙÅ«) horse-nomad state, just possibly remote ancestors of Attila¡¯s Huns, but definitely the inventors of the Steppe State political system that would be replicated by all their successors, and more adapted than replaced even by the Mongols…"

picture


Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.