"What Edward Luttwak Doesn't Know About Ancient China" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
|
Tango01  | 11 Oct 2018 3:39 p.m. PST |
… (Or a Short History of Han-Xiongnu Relations. "A few weeks ago a friend passed along one of the least correct essays I have ever had the misfortune to read. It was written by Edward Luttwak, secret agent author of classic titles in the field of strategic studies like Coup D¡¯¨¦tat: A Practical Handbook, Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, and Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. I was disappointed to find out that this particular piece, published in the Hoover Institute's online magazine Strategika, closely mirrors a passage in Mr. Luttwak's most recent best-seller, The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy. In it Luttwak suggests contemporary Chinese foreign policy follows a pattern first seen in the foreign relations of the Han Dynasty two millennia ago [1]. To quote:
What is peculiar to China¡¯s political culture, and of very great contemporary relevance is the centrality within it of a very specific doctrine on how to bring powerful foreigners¡ªindeed foreigners initially more powerful than the empire¡ªinto a tributary relationship. Specialists concur that this doctrine emerged from the very protracted (3rd century BCE to 1st century CE) but ultimately successful struggle with the Xiongn¨² (ÐÙÅ«) horse-nomad state, just possibly remote ancestors of Attila¡¯s Huns, but definitely the inventors of the Steppe State political system that would be replicated by all their successors, and more adapted than replaced even by the Mongols…"
Main page
link
Amicalement
Armand |
|
