Help support TMP


"Where should Napoleon have been exiled to? " Topic


56 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


2,580 hits since 10 Oct 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

Au pas de Charge13 Nov 2018 9:09 p.m. PST

Didnt he want to be allowed to go to England?

Jeffers14 Nov 2018 9:59 a.m. PST

That's because he hadn't seen Braintree, Slough, Bracknell or Dewsbury Moor.

dibble15 Nov 2018 2:37 a.m. PST

No Alamo for Nappy as he would still be brown bread by 1821, through cancer of the guts.

"Contrary to Blucher's opinion, Napoleon did not deserve to be executed, nor did he deserve to be exiled to St Helena."

So what did he deserve? A stiff talking to by the Duke? A day on the naughty step? Sent to bed without his supper?

14Bore15 Nov 2018 4:20 a.m. PST

Napoleon thought he was or lead to believe he was going to be sent to England.

42flanker15 Nov 2018 5:08 a.m. PST

It's possible he misunderstood overhead references to his being 'sent to Coventry.'

4th Cuirassier15 Nov 2018 6:44 a.m. PST

Well, he could clearly have been hanged for treason in 1815, of course, using his own logic when he had d'Enghien judicially murdered. The Bourbons were the legitimate government, which he plotted to overthrow.

They would have been on more solid ground in whacking him than he was when he had d'Enghien whacked, however. Napoleon's regime was only legitimate because he said it was, whereas the Bourbons' was legitimate because everyone agreed it was, including most of the Marshalate. It certainly wouldn't have required a fiddled show trial where the fix was already in to convict him.

I think Braintree is a bit harsh.

The Azores? Cape Verde? Not quite so off the track and nice weather.

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.