"Drone Control From US" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article I promised to show pictures of the AK47 army that I'm painting - here are the regular forces.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 08 Oct 2018 6:55 p.m. PST |
The U.S. Army is working with industry to implement drone operations that enable high-risk combat missions to be controlled by a U.S.-based pilot, reducing vulnerability to enemy attack and drawing upon advanced satellite networks to improve video feeds… link |
| Stryderg | 08 Oct 2018 7:37 p.m. PST |
Yup, put all the pilots in one place and scatter the drones around the world. No single point of failure there. |
| The Archer | 08 Oct 2018 8:14 p.m. PST |
 stupid idea…. Agreed
|
pzivh43  | 09 Oct 2018 4:16 a.m. PST |
Why not split the pilots in several places? Not a fan of drone combat ops, but still, it keeps pilots safe and accomplishes the missions. |
| David Manley | 09 Oct 2018 4:36 a.m. PST |
Nothing new, happens already |
| nickinsomerset | 09 Oct 2018 8:48 a.m. PST |
Launched from Kandahar, into a holding pattern, command and control past to someone in a growbag in the US, been happening for years. Not all systems, most are still controlled from a GCS in theatre, Tally Ho! |
| Thresher01 | 09 Oct 2018 9:58 a.m. PST |
Reducing vulnerability makes sense, if they can keep the hackers at bay. I wonder about the time-lag though, of SAT Comms, and how that will affect real-time ops. A few seconds delay could be critical to the success or failure of an operation. |
|
