Not where I originally read/heard about it (the nightly news perhaps, as well as Yahoo News, I suspect), but it draws the same conclusion:
link
"After 16 years and billions of dollars, the Navy may have finally acknowledged that its Littoral Combat Ship program looks like a miserable failure.
The service "may not" deploy any of the dozen small surface combatants this year despite officials' previous plans to deploy several to join the 7th and 5th Fleets in Singapore and Bahrain respectively, the U.S. Naval Institute first reported on April 11.
Given the embarrassing cost overruns and frequent mechanical failures that have plagued the program, the exquisitely-detailed report suggests that the Navy has run out of patience for the disappointment mill that is the Littoral Combat Ship, once the backbone of the future fleet that could have 355 ships".
"Will 2018 be the last gasp for the troubled LCS program? Knowing the DOD, probably not — but the USNI News report on the lack of LCS deployments only solidifies one truth about the vessel: LCS, as The War Zone put it, almost definitely stands for ‘Little Crappy Ship.'
PDF link
From page 12 of the PDF report provided above:
"LCS Deployments in 2018
Another potential oversight issue for Congress for the LCS program concerns the number of LCSs that will be deployed in 2018. An April 11, 2018, press report states:
The Navy may not deploy any of its Littoral Combat Ships this year despite previous plans to deploy one to the Middle East and two to Singapore in 2018, due to a confluence of maintenance availabilities that has most of the LCS fleet sidelined this year".
The reason they're being "home-ported" is due to all of the embarrassing breakdowns and design flaws uncovered during them, including rusting holes in their brand new hulls, metal bits left in their power systems from manufacturing, etc., etc..
They want them home, and tied closely to their bases, so they can be rescued quickly and repaired, when incidents occur. The above incidents have done a lot to damage their reputation with congress, and the general public.
Even one of the guys directly involved in the program has chimed in here on TMP about the embarrassment of errors on this failed program.