Help support TMP


"Battle of Monocacy Junction" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Horse, Foot and Guns


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery Limber

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes his initial Union force in 1:72nd scale.


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


709 hits since 4 Sep 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0104 Sep 2018 11:28 a.m. PST

"In any war, there are battles which, with the benefit of hindsight, prove to be much more significant than the actual results of the fighting. The Civil War Battle of Monocacy (muh-NOCK-uh-see) Junction on a stifling hot July 9, 1864 is such a battle. Here in the lush corn and wheat fields just southeast of Frederick, MD, a few thousand rag tag Union troops led by a disgraced General held off a battle-hardened Confederate army three times its size marching to attack a weakly defended Washington, D.C. By Civil War standards, it wasn't a big battle and it didn't last very long. In fact, it was a Confederate victory with Union troops retreating towards Baltimore before supper time. But the Northern forces held long enough and fought hard enough to slow down the Confederate advance, buying time to reinforce Washington and stave off a disaster. The last thing the Union needed at that time was an attack on their capital. They had enough problems already…."
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Cleburne186304 Sep 2018 4:57 p.m. PST

I'd hardly call Lew Wallace a "disgraced general." No need to read any further.

Tango0105 Sep 2018 10:55 a.m. PST

Glup!….


Amicalement
Armand

Bill N05 Sep 2018 4:30 p.m. PST

Monocacy is one of my favorite battlefields.

donlowry05 Sep 2018 6:28 p.m. PST

Grant said that Wallace accomplished more in defeat than a lot of generals did in victory.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.