"BT-7A Tank" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleHow does coverbinding work?
Featured Workbench ArticleCan artificial intelligence create useful maps for wargamers?
Featured Profile ArticleContinuing to research the Tunisian Campaign and my Uncle Jasper's service there.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 22 Aug 2018 9:31 p.m. PST |
In 1/72
Main page link
Amicalement Armand |
Fish | 22 Aug 2018 11:44 p.m. PST |
Not checking any (from the net) before asking but how do these differ from the earlier versions UM has produced like over a decade ago? |
donlowry | 23 Aug 2018 9:13 a.m. PST |
Was there any significant number of BT7s (or 8s) left by the summer of '42? |
Marc33594 | 23 Aug 2018 11:13 a.m. PST |
Don the BT-7 was like a cockroach impossible to kill off. They were even used in 1945 during the Russian Manchurian campaign! |
donlowry | 24 Aug 2018 8:47 a.m. PST |
Well, having them in the Far East is understandable. Japan didn't have anything much better, nor had they seen any combat there during most of the war. But were they still used against the Germans in '42? (Sure they would have used 'em if they had 'em, but did they still have 'em?) I want to know if it's legitimate to include some in my '42 Soviet forces. |
Marc33594 | 25 Aug 2018 6:02 a.m. PST |
Yes, but after 42 pretty rare on the western front. As an example Romanian forces captured 32 BT-7s up to November of 42. |
donlowry | 25 Aug 2018 9:13 a.m. PST |
|
|