Help support TMP


"Robot Sailors Are Coming to Navy Aircraft Carriers" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board

Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battlefield in a Box European Farmhouse

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian expands his 15mm modern building collection.


688 hits since 16 Aug 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0116 Aug 2018 9:43 p.m. PST

"There are few places more busy and stressful than the deck of an aircraft carrier.

That's because a carrier is an airport planted on top of a ship. A U.S. Nimitz-class carrier is longer than three football fields, but that's a lot less acreage than even a regional airport on land. Still, a carrier has to be to launch, recover and prep jet aircraft, and do so quickly and efficiently. That means swarms of sailors pushing carts laden with bombs and missiles around a crowded floating airfield.

Maybe a robot can help?…."
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

SBminisguy17 Aug 2018 7:41 a.m. PST

Could be -- though in addition to the hazards identified -- sea air/salt water corrosion, vibration, crowded busy deck -- they will need to also need to deal with the pitch and roll of the deck in different sea states and a wide range of lighting (night ops, etc.). Probably be solved at some point, I guess.

Tango0117 Aug 2018 11:12 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars17 Aug 2018 5:15 p.m. PST

cheaper to suck a robot through a jet engine than a human airedale.

Thresher0118 Aug 2018 1:05 p.m. PST

I'm not so sure about that, Lion.

Sure, there's the human cost, but they apparently don't do too much damage to a spinning engine, at least relative to what a metal robot would do it it.

So, there's the engine repair/replacement costs to factor in as well.

Gonna need some pretty smart robots to be able to do what a human does on deck, and survive. They're a lot more flexible than the programmed robots.

Tango0118 Aug 2018 3:15 p.m. PST

Agree!


Amicalement
Armand

David Manley19 Aug 2018 10:21 a.m. PST

I have been dropping unsubtle hints at our R&D community about robots for naval damage control…..

Cacique Caribe19 Aug 2018 12:27 p.m. PST

Yep. I hope they can learn how to swim.

Dan

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.