"Decline and fall ... must empires always self-destruct?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleBeowulf paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 10 Aug 2018 12:15 p.m. PST |
"Why Rome? Why, some 2,000 years after the Roman Empire embarked upon its decline and fall, do we remain bewitched by its ruin? From Russell Crowe's Gladiator to Niall Ferguson's histories to Washington thinktanks, the spectre of a crumbling Coliseum still haunts our popular and political culture. The story of the collapse of Rome speaks to something fundamental within the Western imagination. Meditating on its fall is as old as the city itself. In the first century AD, as centurions stamped across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, commentators were already predicting Rome's demise. Critics mourned the lost virtue of the Republic and lamented the Empire's bread-and-circuses decadence. Yet it took another 400 years for Rome to succumb to the Goths and a further 1,000 years before the Byzantine or the Eastern Roman Empire followed suit. But by then the narrative of collapse was clear. To medieval and Renaissance historians it was a morality tale of hubris and nemesis, testifying to the unrelenting cycle of history. What rose had to fall…." Main page link Amicalement Armand
|
Thresher01 | 10 Aug 2018 3:35 p.m. PST |
Probably. Nothing lasts forever, with perhaps the sole exceptions of death and taxes. |
Mars Ultor | 10 Aug 2018 4:13 p.m. PST |
I've been three times to the Forum center of Rome, and the next time I'm just going to spend all day there thinking about things like that, what's came before and what they left. Dynamics of peoples and individuals that make good and bad decisions just don't allow for permanence, sadly. In the Roman situation you have an Gaius J.C. Augustus and then you have a Gaius J.C. Caligula. |
Hector Blackwolf | 10 Aug 2018 8:26 p.m. PST |
Entropy is always a safe bet. Eventually everything has to come to an end. Empires are highly unstable. Only a few have lasted more than a couple centuries at most. Like the Han, Roman is one of the handful of large political units that endured for considerable time. It is less a matter that Rome fell, than that it stood so long. |
catavar | 11 Aug 2018 11:11 a.m. PST |
In Romes case, I think a large part of Roman citizens believed they no longer truly benefited from being part of their government. |
Tango01 | 11 Aug 2018 11:19 a.m. PST |
|
Editor in Chief Bill | 14 Aug 2018 5:44 p.m. PST |
Comments relative to modern politics have been removed. |
|