Help support TMP


"Bombing Submarines with Magnets" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Featured Book Review


978 hits since 27 Jul 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

emckinney27 Jul 2018 11:34 a.m. PST

"The magnets worked on the Soviets with the same maddening results. The crews of several Foxtrots were driven bonkers by the noise and returned to port rather than complete their cruises. Now, the Soviet navy could afford to furlough a sub or two, but NATO could not. Anti-submarine crews couldn't practice with floppy-magnets attached to their exercise targets."

link

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP27 Jul 2018 12:28 p.m. PST

Mr. Roberts, eat your heart out!

Duncan Adams27 Jul 2018 1:02 p.m. PST

So you make submarines easy to find by dropping magnetic noise makers on them.

And how did you find them and know where to drop the magnets?

Duncan

Lion in the Stars27 Jul 2018 6:25 p.m. PST

Well, the early Russian boats were noisy as hell, so relatively easy to detect on passive sonar.

Airplanes don't care about noise, so they tend to use active sonar. Or sometimes a mixed row of active and passive buoys, to try to sucker a sub into going right next to a passive buoy as a 'gap' in the row of active buoys.

The other way to find anything underwater is the Magnetic Anomaly Detector. A steel hull bends the earth's geomagnetic field, and what you do is look for a spot where the geomagnetic field is bent. Sure, there are lots of places where that happens. Shipwrecks, for example. But moving hulls make a bigger distortion.

Duncan Adams27 Jul 2018 6:48 p.m. PST

My point, which I didn't make very clear, is that if you can find them to tag them you probably don't have to tag them.

Duncan

Stryderg27 Jul 2018 8:13 p.m. PST

I guess you could tag them once you spot them, making them easier to track later. Or you could tag them with depth charges making them really easy to track later (they went down, mostly).

Toaster27 Jul 2018 8:27 p.m. PST

Not a war fighting weapon but an awesome cold war non leathal weapon.

Robert

emckinney28 Jul 2018 2:39 p.m. PST

"And how did you find them and know where to drop the magnets?"

Let's suppose that you know or suspect the general<\b> location of an enemy submarine. How many of these magnets can your ASW aircraft carry if it has a 5,000 lb payload? (The PB4Y-2 Privateer--Navy B-24 variant--had a maximum payload of 12,800 lbs.) Suppose that your target submarine has a beam of just over 20 feet. Assuming that there's some magnetic attraction, that you won't get perfect distribution, and you probably won't be dropping precisely across the Target's beam, let's say the the "hit zone" is 25 feet across. If the magnets weigh 10 lbs apiece, you can carry 500 of them and drop them in a line 2 nm long (12,500 feet). That's … not bad. Depth charges/bombs of the period had small effective radii, despite much greater weight, or were contact shaped-charges, which also had to be larger than 10 lbs.

ASW prosecutions took a long time and aircraft seldom prosecuted alone. Surface ships were effective killers, but not always great hunters. If the aircraft could tag the enemy sub and make evasion impossible, there was simply no way for it to escape the surface ships.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.