"Competitive Historical Battles for Hail Caesar." Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Scenarios Message Board Back to the Ancients Scenarios Message Board
Action Log
09 Feb 2019 4:17 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions boardCrossposted to Ancients Scenarios boardCrossposted to Medieval Scenarios board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Remember back in 2005, when I promised pictures of those Sumerian chariot stands in 6mm?
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Uesugi Kenshin  | 21 Jul 2018 5:38 p.m. PST |
What's a good historical battle that makes a well balanced scenario for Hail Caesar? I'm thinking of a battle where both sides have an even chance of winning without having to make major rule changes or troop changes to make it competative. |
| Dexter Ward | 22 Jul 2018 2:39 a.m. PST |
Plataea
Issos
Ipsus
Paraitakene
Sambre |
| Ran The Cid | 23 Jul 2018 6:34 a.m. PST |
Arsuf is one of the more balanced battles of the crusader era. Two generals with their full armies looking for a fight. Hastings is good, but requires a well written mission to get the Saxons off the hill without feeling contrived. |
| Come In Nighthawk | 27 Apr 2019 1:35 p.m. PST |
The Saxons at Hastings obeyed Rule #1, "hold the high ground," and lost anyway… So, why would leaving it make the game "more balanced?" Unless your idea of "balance" is that the Normans should win more quickly? |
|
ponders nirvana.
