"Type 1 Ho-Ni I / II / Type 3 Ho-Ni III" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Beowulf  paints up some WWII Soviet aircraft.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Desert Rats assault a line of dreaded 88s - from the rear!
Current Poll
|
Tango01  | 20 Jul 2018 12:53 p.m. PST |
"Japanese tank engineering always lacked behind the Allies during World War 2 (1939-1945) and only a few notable designs emerged from the fighting. As with other world powers of the time, the nation also invested, although a little too late, in the concept of the dedicated tank destroyer. One example of this became the Type 1 "Ho-Ni" which appeared in two other related battlefield forms, the Type 1 "Ho-Ni II" and the Type 3 "Ho-Ni III". It was built atop the existing running gear and chassis of the Type 97 Chi-Ha Medium Tank. The Type 97 emerged in 1938 prior to the war and, by classification, was a medium tank. However, compared to its contemporaries, it held qualities more closely associated with the light tank concept. At its introduction, the Type 97 did prove on par with Western offerings but, by 1942, it was severely outclassed though production was allowed to continue for lack of anything better…."
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
 Legion 4 | 20 Jul 2018 1:51 p.m. PST |
Too little … too late … is the "short history" of IJF's armor units. |
| Tango01 | 20 Jul 2018 3:50 p.m. PST |
Type 3 Ho-Ni III
link
Amicalement
Armand |
| Mark 1 | 23 Jul 2018 10:40 a.m. PST |
The information at this particular link causes me to wonder on a particular question of definition of terms: The Type 3 Ho-Ni III gun tanks were built on top of the hulls of Type 97 Chi-Ha medium tanks and featured a fully-enclosed casemate for the main gun …. The casemate was fully rotating… So … um … if it was fully rotating, why was it a "casemate" and not a turret? Just wondering if there is a definition in the common-usage of that term that I don't understand. -Mark
(aka: Mk 1) |
| Tango01 | 23 Jul 2018 11:36 a.m. PST |
Good question!. Amicalement
Armand |
| Legion 4 | 23 Jul 2018 4:19 p.m. PST |
Yes, it looks like the German Marder's mount. With limited traverse as it's not a turret. The entire vehicle may have to move to get the better shot. In some situations.
It still looks like something Orks would use regardless …
|
|
