Help support TMP


"Old ESCI kits" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 20mm WWII Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Beer and Pretzels Skirmish (BAPS)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Microscale LCT(5) from Image Studios

Thinking to invade German-held Europe? Then you'll need some of these...


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's 1:100 Hummel Artillery Battery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at more open-topped German artillery vehicles.


Featured Book Review


1,266 hits since 11 Jul 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

historygamer11 Jul 2018 9:41 a.m. PST

So I am curious how people feel the old ESCI kits, especially the M4A1 and Panther kits, compare to today's models?

Silurian11 Jul 2018 9:59 a.m. PST

On the whole I think the ESCI kits are pretty good (except for the tracks), although more recent duplicate kits from Dragon or Revell tend to be better.
Some are excellent (the Dodge weapons carrier, Italian AFVs spring to mind).
Don't have a M4A1, but the Panthers look good even if they don't have the finesse or accuracy of most Dragon variants.

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP11 Jul 2018 10:27 a.m. PST

Agreed. Nice kits but the tracks require way too much work.

historygamer11 Jul 2018 10:32 a.m. PST

I am thinking for gaming. I have some Revell kits. Wonderful models but too fragile for gamers IMHO.

Stephen Hill11 Jul 2018 2:07 p.m. PST

The Panther has some size issues with the turret front, its too wide. BUT, it looks every part a Panther tank. The let down with the original series were the awful tracks.For a model that was released some 40 years ago, it is more accurate than the Revell Panther & its inaccurate glacis plate angle.

jowady11 Jul 2018 4:51 p.m. PST

The M4A1 is a "big hatch" version. Very few (and by very few I mean single digits if any) if any saw combat, most had been converted into DD tanks and most Big Hatch M4A1 hulls were built as 76mm gun tanks.

historygamer11 Jul 2018 5:38 p.m. PST

I have some hasegawa Panthers too. I see the pics stuff on here and it looks good. I prefer the 1/72 scale stuff.

Silurian11 Jul 2018 7:39 p.m. PST

And the ESCI kits are as fragile as the Revell (or Dragon, etc). It just depends on the actual vehicle as to whether you think they are robust enough or not.
Need not be a lot of fiddly stuff on Panthers if you leave off AA MGs.

I use kits of all sorts for gaming, just handle them with care.

historygamer12 Jul 2018 5:09 a.m. PST

Just was curious how people thought ESCI (and Hasegawa) kits measured up to some of todays models (e.g., PSC).

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP12 Jul 2018 2:37 p.m. PST

Can always replace tracks with the wonderful OKB ( shop.okbgrigorov.com/) and no I dont have shares!
L

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP14 Jul 2018 4:42 a.m. PST

What Silurian said: all plastic kits are 'fragile'.

Leon: thanks for that link. I was unaware of that company!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.