"For King and Parliament" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Product Reviews Message Board
|
| cae5ar | 07 Jul 2018 3:36 a.m. PST |
I read a favourable review in WS&S magazine recently but I haven't seen that much about these rules on the internet. I'm keen to hear from anyone who has played them. Do they capture the essence of pike and shot warfare? Troop types, formations, tactics? Are they easy to pick up? Any reviews out there, positive or negative? |
Razor78  | 07 Jul 2018 6:30 a.m. PST |
Well just ordered them yesterday, so will have to let you know what I think if them once I get a chance to play them |
| Snowydog | 07 Jul 2018 10:10 a.m. PST |
|
| Tony S | 07 Jul 2018 1:13 p.m. PST |
We recently used them for an ECW game, and quite liked them. In fact, I liked them a bit better than the Ancients set, perhaps because I've got a "go to" set of ancient rules that I'm very happy with, whereas I'm still open for renaissance warfare. I'd happily play them again! |
 ColCampbell | 07 Jul 2018 3:04 p.m. PST |
We helped play test these rules and enjoyed them. link To my mind they evoke what I believe ECW warfare would be when distilled down to toy soldiers. Like "To the Strongest!" (the earlier ancients/medieval rules upon which they were based) they use a square grid for movement and combat and a card deck (ace through 10) for activations, firing, and combat. Jim |
| dbf1676 | 07 Jul 2018 4:25 p.m. PST |
Could either For King and Parliament or To the Strongest be used for Samurai in the 1500-1615 period? |
| clifblkskull | 07 Jul 2018 8:50 p.m. PST |
There are Samurai lists for To Strongest but early.
The system would easily work
Clif |
|
