Help support TMP


"East Florida Rangers: Cavalry or mounted infantry?" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Action Log

21 Jun 2018 6:03 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from "East Florida Rangers: Cavlary or mounted infanry?" to "East Florida Rangers: Cavalry or mounted infantry?"

Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

War Games Rules 1750 1850


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Black Cat Bases' Vampire Queen

alizardincrimson2 Fezian sails to the Skeleton Seas, and finds inspiration as she goes.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: 1:72 Austrophile Infantry of the Line

War of the Spanish Succession figures for the Spanish theater.


Featured Book Review


620 hits since 21 Jun 2018
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
SC Royalist21 Jun 2018 5:48 p.m. PST

I'm starting to do some loyalist forces and want to make a unit of East Florida Rangers. As far as I can tell from what research I have done they were a mounted unit until June of 1779 when they were reorganized as an infantry unit and called the Royal Carolina Ranges. What I cant find out is were they originally more of a cavalry unit or mounted infantry?

Rudysnelson21 Jun 2018 8:10 p.m. PST

East Florida Rangers were composed of mainly Scots according to a book on their leader. They were woodsmen which rode horses when they had them and the swampy terrain allowed it.

Bill N22 Jun 2018 4:32 a.m. PST

My sense is that they were intended to be extremely mobile skirmish infantry, and hunters/provisioners. In a pinch they could be deployed mounted on the battlefield, but they were not equipped or trained to serve as cavalry.

historygamer22 Jun 2018 5:42 a.m. PST

What does Katcher say? At work, don't have access.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.