"US Army Improving Artillery" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article You wanted more photos of the Santa Claws Gang? Here is Santa and two of his companions.
Featured Profile Article
|
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 15 Jun 2018 4:11 p.m. PST |
The Army is fast-tracking an emerging program to engineer a longer-range artillery cannon able to out range enemy ground forces by hitting targets at more than twice the distance of existing artillery… link |
| zoneofcontrol | 15 Jun 2018 7:10 p.m. PST |
I saw that too and was concerned and confused by the statement on the towed variant. I'm hoping they are not aiming for fewer tubes because of the longer reach. |
| trance | 16 Jun 2018 8:19 a.m. PST |
The consensus in the pentagon seems to be that our current weapons are out ranged by china and Russian pieces. |
| Lion in the Stars | 16 Jun 2018 5:58 p.m. PST |
@Zoneofcontrol: Most artillery in the US is still towed, only the Heavy Brigades use M109 Paladins. Stryker and Infantry Brigades use towed guns (the M777 in the picture in the article). This is sounding like a return to 175 or 203mm tubes for the biggest guns (plus rocket and/or ramjet-assisted projectiles), so my guess is that the Artillery Battalion in each Brigade is going to trade one battery of 155s for a battery of the new guns (two batteries of 155s and one battery of the new guns). These may also replace the MLRS systems, but I doubt it. Different roles. |
| Wyatt the Odd | 16 Jun 2018 6:26 p.m. PST |
This is actually from 2016. The XM907 ERCA Extended Range Common Artillery is the "cannon" and it will go on the M777A2 and the M109A7 SPH. Fox pooched the description (typical). This article has more accurate information: link Wyatt |
| paulgenna | 18 Jun 2018 2:36 p.m. PST |
The idea is to be able to replace the current shells with ones that shoot farther. This gives the military the ability to get outside the range of the enemy. Additionally, the current systems can be maintained. |
|
