"Attalid dynasty warriors as pike or hoplites?" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleAnother week, another unit for the Amazon army!
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Uesugi Kenshin | 28 May 2018 5:43 p.m. PST |
Is any evidence for one over the other or does anyone have any opinions on the matter? |
goragrad | 28 May 2018 9:00 p.m. PST |
In DBA 3 they are rated as either AX or HD. AX would be a looser formation group of hoplites with lighter equipment. The HD (horde) option would be an undrilled citizen levy presumably still equipped in a basic hoplite manner. In that DBA 3 list over half of the army is composed of skirmishing missile troops. Haven't read enough about them to have any other insight. |
gavandjosh02 | 29 May 2018 1:31 a.m. PST |
Duncan Head's armies of the Macedonian and Punic Wars suggests that the militia were not relied upon for field battles. From him, the bulk of the forces were mercenaries and mostly lt troops. He suggests no phalanx; good cavalry, peltasts and other light troops, plus (at various times)Galatian mercenaries and Kappadokian allies. In 189BC, exSeleucid forces including elephants and military settlers (perhaps phalangites) were acquired. |
BigRedBat | 29 May 2018 1:43 a.m. PST |
I'd always pictured them as thueophoroi/thorakitai types; but that can't be the case in the earlier years, before the Gallic invasion. Interesting… |
Uesugi Kenshin | 29 May 2018 8:52 a.m. PST |
Thanks gavandjosh02. There was a good lecture on YouTube on the Successors i watched yesterday which mentioned the use of mercenaries. I did not presume that that meant being solely reliant on them though. Given the immense wealth the city had though they certainly could have afforded to maintain mercenaries year round. Thanks. |
Uesugi Kenshin | 29 May 2018 9:19 a.m. PST |
PS, one of the main reasons I was asking about this was I am researching for a good Successor battle that I could do a year+ long project of collecting the minis for both sides. One of the Roman ones I looked at (Magnesia?) had a significant portion of its troops (8,000 out of 30,000) supplied by Pergamon. I guess that would be a butt-load of Greek mercenaries! |
LORDGHEE | 31 May 2018 3:19 p.m. PST |
|
Uesugi Kenshin | 03 Jun 2018 3:58 p.m. PST |
|
|