"Western Medieval Warfare Flawed - Especially Cavalry" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
|
| Tango01 | 26 May 2018 12:01 p.m. PST |
Interesting thread here…. link
Amicalement
Armand
|
Jcfrog  | 26 May 2018 12:25 p.m. PST |
|
| Toaster | 26 May 2018 12:46 p.m. PST |
Any military force will be shaped by its opponents and fare badly when it encounters something different. Knights and men at arms were no different. Robert |
| Tango01 | 27 May 2018 3:20 p.m. PST |
Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile) Amicalement
Armand |
| goragrad | 27 May 2018 10:29 p.m. PST |
The first post has several errors – Nicopolis was won due to a charge by the Serbian contingent of the Muslim army. Serb knights being some of the hardest charging knights then alive. Later at the Battle of Ankara fighting as vassals of the Ottomans against those Eastern forces the poster admires so much – the Timurids under Tamerlane – the Serbian heavy cavalry/knights repelled the Mongol assaults and cut through their opposition three times before ultimately escaped the encirclement that trapped the rest of the Ottoman army. Interestingly the bulk of the Ottoman army was composed of the same light and medium cavalry as the Timurids. |
| Tango01 | 28 May 2018 10:42 a.m. PST |
Thanks for the info!. Amicalement
Armand |
| dapeters | 29 May 2018 1:30 p.m. PST |
Western armies were comprised of groups of individuals not really units as such. Many of the listed winners and discovered unit discipline. Of course who won the hundred year? |
|
