Help support TMP


"Lawmakers Want Army to Re-Dye Old Camouflage " Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Action Log

26 Apr 2018 9:12 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from "Lawmakers Want Army to Re-Dye Old Camouflage " to "Lawmakers Want Army to Re-Dye Old Camouflage "
  • Removed from Modern Media board
  • Crossposted to Ultramodern Warfare (2008-present) board

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Close And Destroy


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 6

We're back to stump you again with three more figures!


Featured Profile Article

White Night #1: Unknown Aircraft

First of a series – scenario starters!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,053 hits since 26 Apr 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0126 Apr 2018 3:35 p.m. PST

… Uniforms With New Pattern

"Lawmakers want the Army to finalize a plan to dye its pixelated Universal Camouflage Patterned uniforms and equipment to blend with the service's new Operational Camouflage Pattern.

The House Armed Services Committee's subcommittee on readiness released its markup today for the proposed fiscal 2019 National Defense Authorization Act. The document expresses interest in technologies that would allow the Army to re-dye existing universal camouflage uniforms and equipment, with a particular focus on its never-popular, now-obsolete UCP camo.

The Army selected the Operation Camouflage Pattern -- a blend of browns, greens and tans -- to replace the older UCP pattern in 2014 as a result of the service's exhaustive camouflage study…."

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP26 Apr 2018 7:32 p.m. PST

An article about camouflage that does not actually provide a photo of the new version. The quality of journalism today is just terrible.

link

Mike Bunkermeister Creek
bunkermeister.blogspot.com

Cacique Caribe26 Apr 2018 7:43 p.m. PST

Just thought of something …

Have the folks who do WH40K ever heard of camouflage? :)

Dan

Stryderg26 Apr 2018 8:46 p.m. PST

Oh, they've heard about it…and have decided that it's for wimps.

zoneofcontrol26 Apr 2018 9:21 p.m. PST

The part I always had a hard time getting my head around was the various branches of the military going through repeated changes to uniforms while dealing with the constraints of the budget sequestration. Spending curbs caused a roll back in everything from parts and pieces to equipment replacement to entire units and yet it seemed for a while that they had joined the "Uniform Of The Month Club".

USAFpilot27 Apr 2018 6:06 a.m. PST

I always thought it was funny that folks working in office cubicles wearing camouflage uniforms. Unless you are in the field engaging the enemy there is no need for camouflage.

Kevin C27 Apr 2018 7:23 a.m. PST

USAFpilot,

How about this for office camouflage: link

SouthernPhantom27 Apr 2018 9:10 a.m. PST

OCP/Multicam is a fantastic pattern, especially in low light. I am very pleased with it.

UCP is effective in gravel pits and on some couches. I cannot believe that it was selected.

Stryderg27 Apr 2018 9:40 a.m. PST

We used woodland BDU, which was effective for… you guessed it, woodlands.

ancientsgamer27 Apr 2018 3:00 p.m. PST

Camouflage in office settings… used to portray actually working when not😂

Lion in the Stars27 Apr 2018 6:20 p.m. PST

Lawmakers seem to be unaware that the uniforms have a limited lifespan. IIRC, it's about 12 months of use.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.