Help support TMP


"How a bizarre Nazi military machine left a lasting mark..." Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Storing Projects

Containers for when you need to sideline that project you've been working on, or maybe just not lose the bits you're not ready for yet.


950 hits since 21 Apr 2018
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP21 Apr 2018 9:41 p.m. PST

…on the environment.

"The Tirpitz was the Nazis' most imposing warship and the largest battleship ever built by a European navy. It should have been an easy target for bombers, but this massive vessel could hide in plain sight.

Hitler's navy used a toxic artificial fog to conceal the ship when it was stationed in a Norwegian fjord. And, according to new research, this ephemeral smoke left a lasting mark on some of the living witnesses of World War II: the trees.

"The effects of one military engagement during World War II are still evident in the forests of Norway, 70 years later," said Claudia Hartl, a tree-ring researcher at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany…."

picture

Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mark 1 Supporting Member of TMP23 Apr 2018 8:02 p.m. PST

"The Tirpitz was … the largest battleship ever built by a European navy."

Not so sure. I would say it was one of the largest, and might be considered by some to be the largest, but I would not say just that it was the largest.

Tirpitz displaced 42,200 long tons as built, with a length of 823 ft 6 in (251).

Hood was heavier, at 42,670 long tons as built, and longer, with a length of 860 ft 7 in (262.3m).

But Tirpitz displaced 51,800 long tons fully loaded, while Hood only displaced 46,680 long tons at "deep load".

So it is debatable which was the largest. Depends on how you want to compare.

I know, I know. That's not the primary point of the article. But still…

-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2018 11:48 a.m. PST

The Tirpitz was bigger than the Bismark?… or his twin…?

Amicalement
Armand

Marc33594 Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2018 2:31 p.m. PST

Tirpitz was the second of the Bismark class. She was the same dimensions as her sister, Bismark, but wartime modifications made Tirpitz 2,000 tons heavier.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP26 Apr 2018 12:51 p.m. PST

Many thanks!.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.