Help support TMP


"PIAT: An Odd Fellow " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of TOWs


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72 Italeri Russian Infantry, Part I

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian bases up the start of his 1:72 scale WWII Russians.


Featured Workbench Article

Pete Paints 15mm Early War German LMG Teams

Pete is back - this time, with early-war WWII Germans LMG teams.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's 1:100 Puma Scout Troop

We take a look at a kit that builds three different vehicle variants.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,019 hits since 16 Apr 2018
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP16 Apr 2018 8:55 p.m. PST

"The British PIAT grenade launcher, a combination of a medieval crossbow and a modern HEAT grenade, became one of the more unusual examples in its class. Heavy and uncomfortable to use, the PIAT went through many fronts of the Second World War in the hands of Allied soldiers. However, its subsequent career was not long. The weapon did not survive competition from the simpler and more reliable RPG.


British infantry was armed with two types of anti-tank weapons at the start of WWII: the 13.97 mm Boys rifle and the No.68 rifle grenade. Experience in France showed that these weapons could defeat German light tanks, but were ineffective against the medium PzIII and PzIV. The army needed a new anti-tank weapon that was compact but still capable of sufficient penetration. In pursuit of this weapon, British engineers had to resort to some unusual methods…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

goragrad16 Apr 2018 9:49 p.m. PST

All that detail on development and no penetration figures.

Andy ONeill17 Apr 2018 1:58 a.m. PST

Crossbow????
It's a spigot mortar.

deephorse17 Apr 2018 8:37 a.m. PST

Anyone reading the article will see why there is a crossbow reference.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP17 Apr 2018 10:51 a.m. PST

goragrad….


link

link

link

link


Hope it helps.

Amicalement
Armand

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP18 Apr 2018 9:51 a.m. PST

Interesting that the British method of assigning Piat operators was identical to the US with its Bazookas: there were no dedicated operators, everyone was trained to use them and the company or platoon officers just gave them to whoever they wanted.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.