/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory

"2nd unit of Norman warriors on foot, and Norman army tested" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Dark Ages Message Board Back to the Medieval Gallery Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Anatoli | 08 Apr 2018 9:07 a.m. PST |
OK, now the painting truly was on a roll as I finished the second warrior unit on foot within two sittings. Next units will all be mounted and take some time as I have to assembly them (1 mounted warrior and 2 mounted hearth guards). I also have a standard bearer on foot from the plastic warriors kit, and am contemplating if I should use a large paper flag or stick with the small plastic banner attached to the banner pole. We also managed to play a game and try the new army out this evening: link
|
| torokchar | 08 Apr 2018 11:28 a.m. PST |
|
| Celtofkernow | 08 Apr 2018 12:44 p.m. PST |
|
| cae5ar | 08 Apr 2018 2:45 p.m. PST |
Terrific paint jobs and I like the look of round bases for mounted figures. I might have to do some re-basing myself… 40mm diameter? |
| goragrad | 08 Apr 2018 9:07 p.m. PST |
|
| Dexter Ward | 09 Apr 2018 1:51 a.m. PST |
Nice painting, but unlike cae5ar I'm not a fan of round bases for mounted. They make it impossible to put the figures in any kind of close formation. Ovals or rectangles are much better IMO. |
| Anatoli | 09 Apr 2018 8:26 a.m. PST |
@Cae5ar, yep 40mm bases :) |
|