Help support TMP


"Disaster at Abouker: Brueys' or Napoleon Fault?" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board

Back to the Age of Sail Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


1,050 hits since 5 Apr 2018
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP05 Apr 2018 10:21 p.m. PST

Guess who…(smile)


Free to read here

PDF link


Hope you enjoy!


Amicalement
Armand

21eRegt06 Apr 2018 4:59 a.m. PST

Napoleon understood nothing of naval considerations but I have always felt the ultimate responsibility is with the admiral.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Apr 2018 10:53 a.m. PST

How can he desobey…?.

Nelson would do it…?

Amicalement
Armand

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP06 Apr 2018 11:16 a.m. PST

Have to say – the fleet's disposition needs to be with the Admiral

Blutarski06 Apr 2018 12:14 p.m. PST

Well done, Armand. A very nice find indeed.

My verdict – Brueys was at fault in a multiplicity of ways.

He knew Nelson was at sea looking for him, yet he failed to detail any of his frigates as offshore scouts to give distant warning of a British approach.

He apparently never gave any thought until the very last possible moment as to how he would fight a battle. His ultimate decision to fight at anchor was only signaled to his command an hour or two before the British entered Aboukir Bay. No thought was given to anchoring is ships in close mutually supporting order; his ships were all anchored at safe distances from one another in the conventional manner; no attention was paid to close up the head of the French line to the edge of the non-navigable shallows; no ships had springs on their anchor cables to manage the bearing of their gun batteries. To add insult to injury, Brueys had been present at the Battle of St Kitts (1782) and witnessed the very same sort of tactical arrangements successfully employed by the British Admiral Hood to fight his squadron at anchor against DeGrasse's superior French force. Brueys was IMO a man very much out of his professional depth. A more competent French commander could have made a much better resistance.


B

Supercilius Maximus07 Apr 2018 12:07 a.m. PST

Napoleon's errors were strategic, Brueys' mistakes were tactical; reversing the former might have prevented the battle from ever happening, but the latter ensured that the battle was lost.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP07 Apr 2018 11:21 a.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile)


At least… he died as a trully Naval Officer….

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.