Help support TMP


"What did professional soldiers (I.e. mercenaries) in..." Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Armati


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


881 hits since 15 Mar 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0115 Mar 2018 12:21 p.m. PST

… the Middle Ages do in peacetime? And how exactly did you become a soldier anyway?


Interesting thread here…


link

Amicalement
Armand

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP15 Mar 2018 2:10 p.m. PST

Would you call a US marine a mercenary ?

He IS a professional soldier though !!!

I do wish that people would use the correct terminology for what they post.

JimSelzer15 Mar 2018 5:18 p.m. PST

Start wars so they could work?

Personal logo PaulCollins Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2018 5:19 p.m. PST

There were U.S. Marines fighting in the Middle Ages??? I am definitely behind on my reading!

Dn Jackson Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2018 10:10 p.m. PST

"Would you call a US marine a mercenary ?

He IS a professional soldier though !!!

I do wish that people would use the correct terminology for what they post"

Well….until relatively recently, yes, they would be called mercenaries. As a matter of fact at Harper's Ferry in 1860 when Israel Greene brought his Marines from Washington to put a stop to John Brown's raid, they joined the local militia in surrounding the fire house. Robert E. Lee offered the honor of assaulting the ersatz fort to the militia commander who replied, "No, your mercenaries can do it."

foxweasel16 Mar 2018 2:40 a.m. PST

I do wish that people would use the correct terminology for what they post.

Until the 17th century, and much later in some cases, most nations had a mistrust of large standing armies. So mercenaries were seen as ideal to fight in the many wars, these soldiers were known as "professionals" as fighting was their trade.

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Mar 2018 3:19 a.m. PST

No folks, WE call them mercenaries, they didn't back then. THAT is what I'm getting at.

This is the usual view of bad history, looking at the past with the morals and assumptions of today.

Vigilant16 Mar 2018 5:29 a.m. PST

They were formed from men with no alliegence to either of the parties in conflict. Thye were recruited by leaders to fight for a payment for a fixed period. Call them what you will, that is a mercenary. It is not bad history. When they were not employed many resorted to banditry, a major problem well recorded by 14th century sources. The weaknesses of some of the French kings in particular led to major problems with these groups of unemployed warriors.

gunnerphil16 Mar 2018 6:05 a.m. PST

To get back to the question.

Lots would have become bandits, some return home to live of their loot, others would find another war, like the English mercenaries in Italy.

jeeves25 Mar 2018 1:45 p.m. PST

C'mon GildasFacit. The morals and assumptions of today are all we have, unless you have a time machine.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.