Help support TMP


"Late Roman Infantry" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Grade My Gauls

At last! Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally paints the first of his Gauls...


Featured Workbench Article

The Army for Bill: Warband #6

The final warband for the Army for Bill.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,357 hits since 15 Mar 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Marcus Brutus15 Mar 2018 10:13 a.m. PST

With my Punic Romans I distinguished the Hastati from the Principes by using figures with a brass chest protector for the former and chain mail for the later. This isn't probably exactly historical. I imagine that there were Hastati with chain mail and Principes without it. But it works well as a gaming convention and seems to be commonly used.

I am just getting ready to embark on my first Late Roman army and I was wondering if there are certain gaming conventions that distinguish between the different Roman infantry units? For the Palatina I was thinking I would use exclusively chain mail infantry. But to distinguish between Comitatenses and Pseudocomitatenses I was wondering what others have done? Is there a simply system you have followed?

Garand15 Mar 2018 10:19 a.m. PST

I don't know of a specific system, but I tend to simulate the Palatina & Comitatenses with armor, and the pseudocomitatenses (remember these are Limitanei absorbed into the field army) with poorer equipment & no armor at all. Though as you say above with the Republican Romans, there's no reason to assume Limitanei might NOT have armor, but as a handy tabletop reference it works well enough…

Damon.

timurilank15 Mar 2018 11:13 a.m. PST

In a similar vein, I have helmeted, cap, or bareheaded troops as another way to mark troop differences.

The barbarians employed as Feoderati have a mix of tunics with some resembling uniforms, as a way to distinguish them from their barbarian opponents (gifts from the Emperor).

ToysnSoldiers15 Mar 2018 11:39 a.m. PST

Maybe you can use shield designs, as shown in the Notitia Dignitatum. It distinguishes between Auxilia Palatina, Comitatenses and Pseudocomitatenses.

Huscarle17 Mar 2018 2:56 a.m. PST

+1 ToysnSoldiers (check out the Little Big Men Studios transfers)
littlebigmenstudios.com

Spudeus13 Apr 2018 3:19 p.m. PST

Although it sounds silly, I've been looking at helmet crests as a distinguishing factor. 'Regular' comitatenses would be without, while palatina & more elite units such as the Herculiani would have bright crests matching their shields.

catavar13 Apr 2018 4:29 p.m. PST

I think the further they were from the Emperor the less armor they should have is a good rule of thumb.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.