"Unusual rule mechanics" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Utter Drivel Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase Article ESLO Terrain explains about their range of modular buildings.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Interested in an inexpensive pot for cleaning your brushes?
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Bashytubits | 11 Mar 2018 12:11 p.m. PST |
Do very odd or unusual rules mechanics weird you out?
|
robert piepenbrink  | 11 Mar 2018 3:00 p.m. PST |
Not usually. If I can understand the historical problem they're coping with, and it's appropriate for whatever level of command I'm representing, I'm OK. We may have different notions of "odd or unusual" of course. I should note that I run screaming in terror from some very common rule mechanics. My nightmare game involves a command roll--can't move if you rolled the wrong number--a single die combat resolution and the maintenance of a roster for each unit. Each of these is quite popular, though I've never seen all three mass for an attack. |
| JimSelzer | 11 Mar 2018 3:39 p.m. PST |
not sure if I like "owner of game goes 1st" prevalent in some board games |
|
shows us that you don't need money to have great bases.
