Help support TMP


"FIW 12 pounder " Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the French and Indian Wars Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

War Games Rules 1750 1850


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Minairons' 1:600 Xebec

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at a fast-assembly naval kit for the Age of Sail.


Featured Book Review


826 hits since 5 Mar 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0105 Mar 2018 12:20 p.m. PST

Nice job!

picture

picture

picture

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

JimSelzer05 Mar 2018 1:38 p.m. PST

would think a 12lb gun hard to move in wildreness

Glengarry505 Mar 2018 2:03 p.m. PST

Much of the movement, particularly by the French, would've been by water.

historygamer05 Mar 2018 2:53 p.m. PST

So it is supposed to be an English gun. It has some problems.

historygamer05 Mar 2018 3:30 p.m. PST

So here is the problem I have with such posts. The original poster is not the one who painted the above figures. So that immediately puts any comment into a weird space. If you compliment it, the poster (in this case, Tango) kind of takes credit by saying something innocuous, like, glad you like it (even though he has nothing to do with it at all).

If you critique it, that perhaps doesn't seem fair to the original artist, as he didn't post it here for comment – though apparently he did post it somewhere.

The bigger problem (though, admittedly small in the universe), is if the figures have issues – do you point them out so others don't repeat them? Or, do you say nothing, which perhaps perpetuates the problems with them, or say "nice", which is kind of the same as giving a pass to some things that are wrong?

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2018 9:39 p.m. PST

Reading the original blog post provided in Tango's link, this was painted for a "BFG Challenge". And yup, a British 12-pounder certainly counts as a BFG for FIW use!

Certainly would be used on either side of a fort during a siege.

historygamer06 Mar 2018 6:20 a.m. PST

picture

historygamer06 Mar 2018 6:20 a.m. PST

picture

historygamer06 Mar 2018 6:26 a.m. PST

So I am not sure what that model gun is, but it is not English. English guns did not have handles (though some howitzers did), that was more French. Also, why are the parts over the trunions painted brass (bronze) instead of iron? There is some thought, based on this painting, that the guns and most of their ironwork were painted grey, not black. Fort Ligonier repainted most of their guns grey.

The officer figure is painted wearing white breeches. Not sure where that came from as you can see from this painting that Royal Artillery officers wore red breeches while the enlisted men wore blue.

I'm also not sure why the officers queue is painted using white, as all period portraits that I have seen show black ribbon to bind the hair.

You can also see that the enlisted men wear lace on their waistcoats. I am not sure why the enlisted figures have short hair instead of queue either.

historygamer06 Mar 2018 6:27 a.m. PST

picture

Note the ready boxes on the side of these guns, though not pictured in the painting.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.